A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Quality of life outcomes in cryoablation of atrial fibrillation-A literature review. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Cryoballoon ablation (CRYO) is an effective alternative to radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for treating atrial fibrillation (AF), with a focus on improving quality of life (QoL) for patients.
  • A review of clinical studies showed consistent significant improvement in QoL for patients undergoing CRYO after 12 months, regardless of the QoL measurement tools used.
  • Limitations in direct comparisons between CRYO and RFCA, along with the need for more long-term data, highlight the importance of prioritizing QoL assessment in future research.

Article Abstract

Background: Cryoballoon ablation (CRYO) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an established treatment option as alternative for radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA). As symptom relief is still the main indication for PVI, quality of life (QoL) is a key outcome parameter. This review summarizes the evidence about the evolution of QoL after CRYO.

Methods: A search for clinical studies reporting QoL outcomes after CRYO was performed on PUBMED and COCHRANE. A total of 506 publications were screened and 10 studies met the in- and exclusion criteria.

Results: All studies considered QoL as a secondary endpoint and reported significant improvement in QoL between baseline and 12 months follow-up, independent of the QoL instruments used. The effect size of CRYO on QoL was comparable between studies and present in both paroxysmal and persistent AF. Direct comparison between CRYO and RFCA was limited to two studies, there was no difference between ablation modalities after 12 months FU. Two studies in paroxysmal AF reported outcome beyond 12 months follow-up and QoL improvement was maintained up to 36 months after ablation. There were no long-term data available for persistent AF.

Conclusion: CRYO of AF significantly improves QoL. The scarce amount of data with direct comparison between subgroups limits further exploration. Assessment of QoL should be considered a primary outcome parameter in future trials with long-term follow-up.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pace.14341DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

qol
10
quality life
8
outcome parameter
8
months follow-up
8
studies paroxysmal
8
direct comparison
8
studies
6
cryo
5
life outcomes
4
outcomes cryoablation
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!