Onychomycosis is common. Diagnosis can be confirmed by various methods; a commonly used method is the histological examination of nail clippings. A deep learning system was developed and its diagnostic accuracy compared with that of human experts. A dataset with annotations for fungal elements was used to train an artificial intelligence (AI) model. In a second dataset (n=199) the diagnostic accuracy of the AI was compared with that of dermatopathologists. The results show a non-inferiority of the deep learning system to that of analogue diagnosis (non-inferiority margin 5%) with respect to specificity and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The AI achieved an AUC of 0.981. One limitation of this system is the need for a large number of training images. The AI had difficulty recognizing spores and confused serum or aggregated bacteria with fungal elements. Use of this deep learning system in dermatopathology routine might help to diagnose onychomycosis more efficiently.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9413660PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/00015555-3893DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

deep learning
16
learning system
12
analogue diagnosis
8
diagnostic accuracy
8
accuracy compared
8
fungal elements
8
deep
4
learning approach
4
approach histopathological
4
diagnosis
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!