Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Motor imagery (MI) is a promising therapeutic technique for stroke rehabilitation.
Objective: To assess the effects of MI on gait rehabilitation after stroke.
Methods: To summarize the "Cochrane Review" by Silva et al.RESULTS:Twenty-one studies with 762 participants were included in the Cochrane review. Very low level of certainty evidence pointed to some beneficial effects of MI alone or combined with action observation or physical practice on walking speed compared to other therapies. There is uncertainty about the effect of MI compared to other therapies in terms of motor function or functional mobility.
Conclusions: High-quality adequately powered studies investigating the effects of MI in individuals with stroke should be encouraged.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/NRE-218004 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!