Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7094070 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1758573219834934 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Artificial intelligence in clinical settings: a systematic review of its role in language translation and interpretation.
Ann Transl Med
December 2024
Division of Advanced Gastrointestinal and Bariatric Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Background: Addressing language barriers through accurate interpretation is crucial for providing quality care and establishing trust. While the ability of artificial intelligence (AI) to translate medical documentation has been studied, its role for patient-provider communication is less explored. This review evaluates AI's effectiveness in clinical translation by assessing accuracy, usability, satisfaction, and feedback on its use.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNotice of Retraction and Replacement: Insights into undergraduate medical student selection tools: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Educ Eval Health Prof
December 2024
Office of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine & Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Peer reviewers' conflicts of interest in biomedical research: scoping review.
BMJ Evid Based Med
January 2025
Cochrane Denmark & Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Odense (CEBMO), Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Background: Peer review may improve the quality of research manuscripts and aid in editorial decisions, but reviewers can have conflicts of interest that impact on their recommendations.
Objectives: The objective was to systematically map and describe the extent and nature of empirical research on peer reviewers' conflicts of interest in biomedical research.
Design: Scoping review METHODS: In this scoping review, we included studies investigating peer reviewers' conflicts of interest in journal manuscripts, theses and dissertations, conference abstracts, funding applications and clinical guidelines.
The trustworthiness of registered randomised control trials on hysteroscopy.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
December 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia; Monash Women's, Monash Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; Aberdeen Centre for Women's Health Research, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK. Electronic address:
Introduction: The objective of this study was to assess the publication status of RCTs studying hysteroscopy registered on clinical trial registries, and the trustworthiness of these studies.
Material And Methods: We systematically searched 23 clinical trial registries and MEDLine for studies on hysteroscopy registered between March 2012 and 25 March 2022. Published RCTs were assessed for trustworthiness using the Trustworthiness in RAndomised Controlled Trials (TRACT) checklist.
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!