A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Simultaneous Topography-Guided PRK/CXL Versus Topography-Assisted PTK/CXL: 1-Year Prospective Outcomes in Keratoconic Eyes. | LitMetric

Purpose: To compare 1-year visual and tomographic outcomes of topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy (TGPRK) and topography-assisted phototherapeutic keratectomy (TPTK) with corneal cross-linking (CXL).

Methods: TGPRK and TPTK were performed in 72 eyes (68 patients) and 74 eyes (71 patients), respectively. Based on the TGPRK ablation plan, the eyes underwent TPTK where the theoretical minimum corneal thickness (MCT) after surgery was less than 400 µm. In the TGPRK group, the theoretical maximum ablation depth was 50 µm after epithelium removal. In TPTK, a decentered single-step PTK was performed only in the steepest anterior curvature zone and the stromal ablation depth was limited to 25 µm. After ablation, accelerated CXL was performed in the central 8-mm zone (9 mW/cm for 10 minutes in "epithelium-off" mode) in both TGPRK and TPTK. The visual acuity and tomography were assessed.

Results: Improvement in uncorrected ( = .73) and corrected ( = .66) distance visual acuity was similar between the two groups. However, TGPRK eyes had a greater decrease in keratometry, anterior defocus, and spherical aberration ( < .001) at the cost of greater ablation of tissue ( < .001). The median MCT decreased by 27 and 52.5 µm in the TPTK and TGPRK eyes, respectively. Both groups had similar decreases in anterior root mean square of lower ( = .10) and higher ( = .12) order aberrations.

Conclusions: Both TGPRK and TPTK improved visual acuity in the keratoconic eyes at 1 year of follow-up. However, TPTK removed less volume of tissue. Further, it could be an alternative to TGPRK if the theoretical stromal ablation exceeds 50 µm in thin keratoconic corneas. .

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20210609-01DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

tgprk tptk
12
visual acuity
12
tgprk
9
keratoconic eyes
8
tptk
8
eyes patients
8
ablation depth
8
stromal ablation
8
tgprk eyes
8
eyes
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!