Purpose: Although the clinical effect of dienogest for endometriosis after conservative surgery has been proven, the cost-effectiveness of this new pharmacotherapy remains to be determined. We aimed to assess the health economic implications of dienogest versus a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a; goserelin in the Chinese setting.

Methods: A decision tree model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of dienogest compared with a GnRH-a (goserelin) after conservative surgery for endometriosis during a 2-year time horizon from the perspective of a health care system in China. The cost of drugs, use of outpatient care facilities, administration of medications, routine laboratory work and imaging studies, and treatment of drug-related adverse events were considered. We obtained clinical efficacy data from the peer-reviewed literature. Base case findings were further tested with 1-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

Findings: The model projects that treatment with dienogest would result in a modest incremental 0.02 quality-adjusted life-year gains compared with a GnRH-a (goserelin) (1.48 vs 1.46) at a cost saving of ¥7274 (¥22,809 vs ¥30,164). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis found that dienogest has a 100% probability of % being considered cost-effective compared with a GnRH-a (goserelin) at the willingness-to-pay threshold of 3 times the gross domestic product per capita (¥64,644 × 3) of China in 2018 (¥1 = US$0.1454 and €0.1248).

Implications: Dienogest is more effective and cost-saving compared with a GnRH-a (goserelin) in the treatment of patients with endometriosis after conservative surgery in China.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.07.002DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gnrh-a goserelin
20
conservative surgery
16
compared gnrh-a
16
analysis dienogest
8
dienogest compared
8
gonadotropin-releasing hormone
8
hormone agonist
8
surgery endometriosis
8
endometriosis conservative
8
probabilistic sensitivity
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • The study investigated the effectiveness of initiating goserelin therapy for adenomyosis during different phases of the menstrual cycle, enrolling 115 premenopausal patients divided into three groups: menstrual, follicular, and luteal.
  • Results showed that the timing of treatment did not significantly affect uterine size, pain levels, or hemoglobin improvement, but starting during the luteal phase led to increased uterine bleeding.
  • The study concluded that goserelin can be initiated outside the menstrual period for convenience, but cautioned against using it during the luteal phase due to higher bleeding risks, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment plans.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This prospective cohort study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of goserelin 10.8 mg administered trimonthly with goserelin 3.6 mg administered monthly in premenopausal females with symptomatic adenomyosis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists in prostate cancer: A comparative review of efficacy and safety.

Indian J Cancer

March 2022

Medical Affairs, AstraZeneca Pharma India Ltd, Manyatha Tech Park, Rachenahalli, Bangalore, Karnataka, India, Bangalore.

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) using gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (s) (GnRH-A) remains the backbone of advanced prostate cancer treatment. In this review, we assessed the efficacy, safety, and convenience of administration of various GnRH-A. All GnRH-A (goserelin, triptorelin, buserelin, histrelin, and leuprorelin) have comparable potential to suppress testosterone (T) levels (≤50 ng/dL in a month and ≤20 ng/dL in 3 months).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To study the efficacy and safety of the dienogest and the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) in symptomatic females with uterine adenomyosis.

Methods: A total of 127 patients with adenomyosis with a chief complaint of dysmenorrhea were recruited. The first group received 2 mg of dienogest (DNG) daily, whereas the second group received goserelin acetate (GS) (3.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Although the clinical effect of dienogest for endometriosis after conservative surgery has been proven, the cost-effectiveness of this new pharmacotherapy remains to be determined. We aimed to assess the health economic implications of dienogest versus a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a; goserelin in the Chinese setting.

Methods: A decision tree model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of dienogest compared with a GnRH-a (goserelin) after conservative surgery for endometriosis during a 2-year time horizon from the perspective of a health care system in China.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!