AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study aimed to see if reducing the time between office visits helps improve blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension by using various strategies, including training for clinicians and regular feedback.
  • - Involving 4277 participants from health centers, the trial found that while there was a slight reduction in systolic blood pressure (1.13 mmHg) during the intervention, this improvement wasn't maintained afterwards, and the time between visits did not decrease.
  • - Despite the lack of significant changes in visit frequency and sustained blood pressure reduction, there was a 5% increase in overall hypertension control during and after the intervention period, suggesting some positive outcomes in patient management.

Article Abstract

Background: Shortening time between office visits for patients with uncontrolled hypertension represents a potential strategy for improving blood pressure (BP).

Objective: We evaluated the impact of multimodal strategies on time between visits and on improvement in systolic BP (SBP) among patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

Design: We used a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial with three wedges involving 12 federally qualified health centers with three study periods: pre-intervention, intervention, and post-intervention.

Participants: Adult patients with diagnosed hypertension and two BPs ≥ 140/90 pre-randomization and at least one visit during post-randomization control period (N = 4277).

Intervention: The core intervention included three, clinician hypertension group-based trainings, monthly clinician feedback reports, and monthly meetings with practice champions to facilitate implementation.

Main Measures: The main measures were change in time between visits when BP was not controlled and change in SBP. A secondary planned outcome was changed in BP control among all hypertension patients in the practices.

Key Results: Median follow-up times were 34, 32, and 32 days and the mean SBPs were 142.0, 139.5, and 139.8 mmHg, respectively. In adjusted analyses, the intervention did not improve time to the next visit compared with control periods, HR = 1.01 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.04). SBP was reduced by 1.13 mmHg (95% CI: -2.10, -0.16), but was not maintained during follow-up. Hypertension control (< 140/90) in the practices improved by 5% during intervention (95% CI: 2.6%, 7.3%) and was sustained post-intervention 5.4% (95% CI: 2.6%, 8.2%).

Conclusions: The intervention failed to shorten follow-up time for patients with uncontrolled BP and showed very small, statistically significant improvements in SBP that were not sustained. However, the intervention showed statistically and clinically relevant improvement in hypertension control suggesting that the intervention affected clinician decision-making regarding BP control apart from visit frequency. Future practice initiatives should consider hypertension control as a primary outcome.

Clinical Trial: www.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02164331.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8738829PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07016-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patients uncontrolled
12
hypertension control
12
blood pressure
8
cluster randomized
8
time visits
8
95% 26%
8
hypertension
7
intervention
7
control
7
time
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!