Orally inhaled drug products (OIDPs) are an important group of medicines traditionally used to treat pulmonary diseases. Over the past decade, this trend has broadened, increasing their use in other conditions such as diabetes, expanding the interest in this administration route. Thus, the bioequivalence of OIDPs is more important than ever, aiming to increase access to affordable, safe and effective medicines, which translates into better public health policies. However, regulatory agencies leading the bioequivalence process are still deciding the best approach for ensuring a proposed inhalable product is bioequivalent. This lack of agreement translates into less cost-effective strategies to determine bioequivalence, discouraging innovation in this field. The Next-Generation Impactor (NGI) is an example of the slow pace at which the inhalation field evolves. The NGI was officially implemented in 2003, being the last equipment innovation for OIDP characterization. Even though it was a breakthrough in the field, it did not solve other deficiencies of the BE process such as dissolution rate analysis on physiologically relevant conditions, being the last attempt of transferring technology into the field. This review aims to reveal the steps required for innovation in the regulations defining the bioequivalence of OIDPs, elucidating the pitfalls of implementing new technologies in the current standards. To do so, we collected the opinion of experts from the literature to explain these trends, showing, for the first time, the stakeholders of the OIDP market. This review analyzes the stakeholders involved in the development, improvement and implementation of methodologies that can help assess bioequivalence between OIDPs. Additionally, it presents a list of methods potentially useful to overcome some of the current limitations of the bioequivalence standard methodologies. Finally, we review one of the most revolutionary approaches, the inhaled Biopharmaceutical Classification System (IBCs), which can help establish priorities and order in both the innovation process and in regulations for OIDPs.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8309038 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13071051 | DOI Listing |
Front Med (Lausanne)
February 2023
Wuxi People's Hospital Affiliated with Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.
Aims: Systemic pharmacokinetic (PK) studies can reflect the overall exposure of orally inhaled drug Products (OIDPs) in the blood after inhalation into the lung and can be used to evaluate the bioequivalence of test and reference products. The aim of this article is: (1) to study the PK characteristics and bioequivalence of ipratropium bromide (IB) inhalation aerosol, reference and test products in healthy Chinese subjects; (2) to establish a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model and verify the accuracy of the model in predicting bioequivalence; (3) attempt to use the model to predict the regional distribution of particles in the lung after inhalation, and discuss the effect of gastrointestinal drug absorption of IB on systemic exposure.
Methods: The study involved two clinical studies.
J Pharm Sci
July 2022
Sichuan Purity Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, PR China; School of Pharmacy, Chengdu University of T.C.M, Chengdu 611137, Sichuan, PR China. Electronic address:
Charcoal blockade is a useful approach to block gastrointestinal (GI) absorption of orally inhaled drug products (OIDPs) and therefore can be used effectively to determine drug absorption exclusively via the pulmonary route. Charcoal blockade efficiency (CBE) should be measured to show whether adequate blockade of GI exposure is achieved in bioequivalence (BE) study. The purpose of this study is to employ a model method to calculate the CBE for a pilot pharmacokinetic (PK) BE study of inhaled ipratropium bromide.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Pharmacol Ther
November 2022
Office of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Herein, we present the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Office of Research and Standards' current thinking, challenges, and opportunities for comparative clinical endpoint bioequivalence (BE) studies of orally inhaled drug products (OIDPs). Given the product-associated complexities of OIDPs, the FDA currently uses an aggregate weight-of-evidence approach to demonstrate that a generic OIDP is bioequivalent to its reference listed drug. The approach utilizes comparative clinical endpoint BE or pharmacodynamic BE studies, pharmacokinetic BE studies, and in vitro BE studies to demonstrate equivalence, in addition to formulation sameness and device similarity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFExpert Opin Drug Deliv
December 2021
Department of Drug Regulatory Affairs, BVDU Poona College of Pharmacy, Pune, India.
Introduction: Bioequivalence is established by comparing the bioequivalence study results of generic drugs with the reference listed drug. Several global regulatory agencies have published the guidance for locally acting orally inhaled drug products (OIDPs) for bioequivalence approaches.
Areas Covered: The prime intent of the present article is to compare the regulatory guidance for bioequivalence assessment of locally acting OIDPs published by global regulatory authorities.
Pharmaceutics
July 2021
Escuela de Química y Farmacia, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2340000, Chile.
Orally inhaled drug products (OIDPs) are an important group of medicines traditionally used to treat pulmonary diseases. Over the past decade, this trend has broadened, increasing their use in other conditions such as diabetes, expanding the interest in this administration route. Thus, the bioequivalence of OIDPs is more important than ever, aiming to increase access to affordable, safe and effective medicines, which translates into better public health policies.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!