We aimed to assess how evidence-based stroke care changed over the two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. We analyzed acute stroke patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital in Germany during the first (2 March 2020-9 June 2020) and second (23 September 2020-31 December 2020, 100 days each) infection waves. Stroke care performance indicators were compared among waves. A 25.2% decline of acute stroke admissions was noted during the second (n = 249) compared with the first (n = 333) wave of the pandemic. Patients were more frequently tested SARS-CoV-2 positive during the second than the first wave (11 (4.4%) vs. 0; < 0.001). There were no differences in rates of reperfusion therapies (37% vs. 36.5%; = 1.0) or treatment process times ( > 0.05). However, stroke unit access was more frequently delayed (17 (6.8%) vs. 5 (1.5%); = 0.001), and hospitalization until inpatient rehabilitation was longer (20 (1, 27) vs. 12 (8, 17) days; < 0.0001) during the second compared with the first pandemic wave. Clinical severity, stroke etiology, appropriate secondary prevention medication, and discharge disposition were comparable among both waves. Infection control measures may adversely affect access to stroke unit care and extend hospitalization, while performance indicators of hyperacute stroke care seem to be untainted.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8307576PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life11070710DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stroke unit
12
stroke care
12
stroke
9
unit care
8
waves covid-19
8
covid-19 pandemic
8
acute stroke
8
performance indicators
8
care
6
waves
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!