AI Article Synopsis

  • People with mental illness often face a higher risk of type 2 diabetes due to factors like poor diet and inactivity, and there are communication barriers between them and health professionals.
  • The study involved interviews with 18 social and healthcare professionals who discussed the challenges they encounter when trying to implement health promotion philosophies in various settings.
  • Despite their desire to adopt holistic and person-centered care approaches, professionals struggled with rigid organizational structures that hindered their ability to apply these philosophies effectively.

Article Abstract

Background And Aim: Compared with the general population, people with mental illness are at higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes due to poor diet, medication and inactive lifestyle. People with mental illness and members of the general population are equally interested in health behaviour change, but those with mental illness experience communication barriers with professionals. The study aimed to explore philosophies that social care and healthcare professionals apply to health promotion activities targeting people with mental illness and challenges they face in applying these philosophies across multiple settings.

Methods: Qualitative interviews were conducted with 18 social and healthcare professionals in a range of settings in 2016-2019. Descriptive qualitative analysis was applied to interview data.

Results: Interviewees faced many structural challenges in the organisation of their work, which did not coincide with their philosophy or intentions in relation to health promotion. Three philosophical categories were identified: (a) health promotion approach, (b) elements of care and (c) social relations. Many interviewees intended to apply philosophies of broadly defined health, dialogue-based health education, and incremental approaches to health behaviour change. They wanted to provide holistic and flexible care and they valued peer-to-peer activities, family and friend involvement in care and a trusting relationship between the professional and the person with mental illness. However, rigid structures determining the organisation of health promotion challenged professionals' ability to follow their philosophical intentions.

Conclusion: Interviewees aspired to a collaborative, empowering and person-centred approach, but practical and structural factors made this difficult to achieve in practice. Major changes are required at the organisational level, implemented with the active involvement of professionals and people with mental illness.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/scs.13023DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mental illness
24
health promotion
20
people mental
16
health
10
rigid structures
8
general population
8
health behaviour
8
behaviour change
8
healthcare professionals
8
mental
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!