Background And Objective: Words of estimative probability are used in medical writing. Authors know the number they intend the word to mean, readers do not. The objective of this study is to assess the variability of words having numeric meaning to medical doctors.

Design: A survey of 131 American trained MD's and DO's was done regarding their interpretation of 27 commonly used words of the estimative probability they placed on each word.

Methods: Statistical assessments were done to evaluate specific word meaning as a number or range to physicians and compared to each other's interpretation.

Results: For 19 of the 27 words had a 30% +/- (60% variance) of interpretation. Twenty-five of the 27 had less than 38% agreement on numeric meaning. Only two words had more than 74% numeric agreement.

Conclusion: Words of estimative probability have widely varied interpretations to physicians. This makes interpretation of those words incomprehensible for scientific meaning resulting in communication without comprehension.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8325478PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2021.00034DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

estimative probability
12
medical writing
8
numeric meaning
8
representing numeric
4
numeric probabilities
4
probabilities medical
4
writing ambiguous
4
ambiguous misinterpreted
4
misinterpreted background
4
background objective
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!