AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigated the usefulness of baseline PET-CT parameters, specifically maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG), in predicting treatment outcomes for stage 4 gastroesophageal cancer patients.
  • Researchers analyzed data from 129 treatment-naive patients over a median follow-up of 61 months and found no significant influence of PET-CT results on overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) regardless of the number of metastatic sites.
  • The findings suggest that detailed PET-CT analyses do not provide valuable prognostic information, indicating limited utility for baseline PET-CT in untreated metastatic gastroesophageal cancer patients.

Article Abstract

Background: The value of baseline fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) remains uncertain once gastroesophageal cancer is metastatic. We hypothesized that assessment of detailed PET-CT parameters (maximum standardized uptake value [SUVmax] and/or total lesion glycolysis [TLG]), and the extent of metastatic burden could aid prediction of probability of response or prognosticate.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed treatment-naive patients with stage 4 gastroesophageal cancer (December 2002-August 2017) who had initial PET-CT for cancer staging at MD Anderson Cancer Center. SUVmax and TLG were compared with treatment outcomes for the full cohort and subgroups based on metastatic burden (≤2 or >2 metastatic sites).

Results: We identified 129 patients with metastatic gastroesophageal cancer who underwent PET-CT before first-line therapy. The median follow-up time was 61 months. The median overall survival (OS) was 18.5 months; the first progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.5 months. SUVmax or TLG of the primary tumor or of all metastases combined had no influence on OS or PFS, whether the number of metastases was ≤2 or >2. Overall response rates (ORRs) to first-line therapy were 48% and 45% for patients with ≤2 and >2 metastases, respectively (nonsignificant). ORR did not differ based on low or high values of SUVmax or TLG.

Conclusions: This is the first assessment of a unique set of PET-CT data and its association with outcomes in metastatic gastroesophageal cancer. In our large cohort of patients, detailed analyses of PET-CT (by SUVmax and/or TLG) did not discriminate any parameters examined. Thus, baseline PET-CT in untreated metastatic gastroesophageal cancer patients has limited or no utility.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000517842DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

gastroesophageal cancer
24
metastatic gastroesophageal
16
metastatic
8
cancer
8
metastatic burden
8
suvmax tlg
8
first-line therapy
8
pet-ct
7
gastroesophageal
6
patients
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!