AI Article Synopsis

  • Cell therapy aims to repair damaged tissues by transplanting human cells, but limited research has been conducted on its effectiveness for nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM).
  • A meta-analysis of 11 randomized clinical trials involving 574 participants showed that cell therapy significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and reduced left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), along with enhancing functional capacity, as indicated by increased walking distance.
  • Despite these positive outcomes, there were no significant differences in major adverse cardiac events or quality of life metrics, indicating a need for larger, well-designed studies to further evaluate the safety and efficacy of cell therapy in NICM patients.

Article Abstract

Cell therapy involves transplantation of human cells to promote repair of diseased or injured tissues and/or cells. Only a limited number of mostly small-scale trials have studied cell therapy in nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). We performed a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to assess the safety and efficacy of cell therapy in NICM. Electronic databases were searched for relevant RCTs from inception until August 2020. Outcomes assessed were left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter or volume (LVEDD), quality of life (QoL) indices, and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Weighted mean differences (MDs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated using random-effects methods. Eleven RCTs with 574 participants were included in the analysis. There was a significant increase in mean LVEF (MD, 4.17%; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.66-6.69) and modest decrease in LVEDD (SMD, -0.50; 95% CI = -0.95 to -0.06) in patients treated with cell therapy compared with controls. Cell therapy was also associated with improvement in functional capacity, as assessed by the 6-minute walking distance (MD, 72.49 m; 95% CI = 3.44-141.53). No significant differences were seen in MACEs and QoL indices between treated and control groups. This meta-analysis suggests that cell therapy may improve LV systolic function and may be associated with improvement in LVEDD and functional capacity compared with maximal medical therapy. Cell therapy was safe, with no significant difference in MACEs between treatment and control groups. However, given the limitations of current studies, larger well-designed RCTs are needed to evaluate the efficacy of cell therapy in patients with NICM.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8459637PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sctm.21-0094DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cell therapy
36
cell
9
therapy
9
therapy nonischemic
8
meta-analysis randomized
8
efficacy cell
8
left ventricular
8
qol indices
8
associated improvement
8
functional capacity
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!