AI Article Synopsis

  • Aptamer-based methods like the SomaScan can measure a larger number of proteins (up to 7000) compared to traditional immunoassays, potentially allowing for better discovery in biomedical research.
  • In a study of 294 patients, the reliability of biomarker associations between the two methods was evaluated, revealing moderate inter-platform correlations (median r = 0.54 for postoperative and r = 0.41 for preoperative samples) that were influenced by protein concentration.
  • While similar associations for Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) were found between both methods, discrepancies in odds ratios were significant in 14% of cases, particularly for biomarkers with lower inter-platform correlations.

Article Abstract

Although immunoassays are the most widely used protein measurement method, aptamer-based methods such as the SomaScan platform can quantify up to 7000 proteins per biosample, creating new opportunities for unbiased discovery. However, there is limited research comparing the consistency of biomarker-disease associations between immunoassay and aptamer-based platforms. In a substudy of the TRIBE-AKI cohort, preoperative and postoperative plasma samples from 294 patients with previous immunoassay measurements were analyzed using the SomaScan platform. Inter-platform Spearman correlations (r) and biomarker-AKI associations were compared across 30 preoperative and 34 postoperative immunoassay-aptamer pairs. Possible factors contributing to inter-platform differences were examined including target protein characteristics, immunoassay, and SomaScan coefficients of variation, other assay characteristics, and sample storage time. The median r was 0.54 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.34-0.83) in postoperative samples and 0.41 (IQR 0.21-0.69) in preoperative samples. We observed a trend of greater r in biomarkers with greater concentrations; the Spearman correlation between the concentration of protein and the inter-platform correlation was 0.64 in preoperative pairs and 0.53 in postoperative pairs. Of proteins measured by immunoassays, we observed significant biomarker-AKI associations for 13 proteins preop and 24 postop; of all corresponding aptamers, 8 proteins preop and 12 postop. All proteins significantly associated with AKI as measured by SomaScan were also significantly associated with AKI as measured by immunoassay. All biomarker-AKI odds ratios were significantly different (P < 0.05) between platforms in 14% of aptamer-immunoassay pairs, none of which had high (r > 0.50) inter-platform correlations. Although similar biomarker-disease associations were observed overall, biomarkers with high physiological concentrations tended to have the highest-confidence inter-platform operability in correlations and biomarker-disease associations. Aptamer assays provide excellent precision and an unprecedented coverage and promise for disease associations but interpretation of results should keep in mind a broad range of correlations with immunoassays.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8572170PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2021.07.005DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

biomarker-aki associations
12
biomarker-disease associations
12
somascan platform
8
preoperative postoperative
8
proteins preop
8
preop postop
8
associated aki
8
aki measured
8
correlations biomarker-disease
8
associations
7

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • Aptamer-based methods like the SomaScan can measure a larger number of proteins (up to 7000) compared to traditional immunoassays, potentially allowing for better discovery in biomedical research.
  • In a study of 294 patients, the reliability of biomarker associations between the two methods was evaluated, revealing moderate inter-platform correlations (median r = 0.54 for postoperative and r = 0.41 for preoperative samples) that were influenced by protein concentration.
  • While similar associations for Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) were found between both methods, discrepancies in odds ratios were significant in 14% of cases, particularly for biomarkers with lower inter-platform correlations.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Urine Biomarkers and Perioperative Acute Kidney Injury: The Impact of Preoperative Estimated GFR.

Am J Kidney Dis

December 2015

Department of Internal Medicine, Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. Electronic address:

Background: The interaction between baseline kidney function and the performance of biomarkers of acute kidney injury (AKI) on the development of AKI is unclear.

Study Design: Post hoc analysis of prospective cohort study.

Setting & Participants: The 1,219 TRIBE-AKI Consortium adult cardiac surgery cohort participants.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Point-of-Care Testing at the Disaster-Emergency-Critical Care Interface.

Point Care

December 2012

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine.

Point-of-care (POC) testing allows for medical testing to be performed across the disaster-emergency-critical care continuum. The disaster-emergency-critical care continuum begins with the identification of at-risk patients, followed by patient stabilization, and ultimately transfer to an alternate care facility or mobile hospital for comprehensive critical care. Gaps at the interfaces for each of these settings leads to excess mortality and morbidity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!