A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Combined endoscopic endonasal and transorbital approach to skull base tumors: a systematic literature review. | LitMetric

Introduction: In the last decades, there has been a marked evolution in skull base surgery techniques and more recently a combination of different corridors has been proposed and used in order to improve angles of attack, shorten working distances, and ameliorate visualization of skull base lesions. Recently, the endoscopic endonasal and transorbital routes have been combined as multiportal approach to reach and treat complex skull base neoplasms. The aim of this paper is to examine data extracted from the recent literature about the feasibility and effectiveness of combined endonasal and transorbital endoscopic multiportal surgery.

Evidence Acquisition: A PubMed comprehensive search of literature published until October 2020 was conducted. Nine studies, regarding 24 patients, were included.

Evidence Synthesis: The majority of tumors were meningiomas (62.5%), mostly located at the spheno-orbital region (93.3%). GTR was accomplished in 10 patients (41.7%), NTR in two patients (8.3%). Endonasal transpterygoid approach (N.=8) and superior eyelid access (N.=17) were the most used routes used. No case of CSF fistula was observed, and the most common complication was a transient periorbital edema. The average hospitalization time (days) was five days.

Conclusions: A combined endoscopic endonasal and transorbital multiportal approach grants an adequate corridor to access several skull base tumors, such as those extending towards the paramedian aspects, providing good outcomes in terms of extent of tumor resection with acceptable rates of complications. These preliminary results might encourage the use of multiportal approaches in selected complex skull base neoplasms.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0390-5616.21.05401-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

skull base
24
endonasal transorbital
16
endoscopic endonasal
12
combined endoscopic
8
base tumors
8
multiportal approach
8
complex skull
8
base neoplasms
8
skull
6
base
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!