Cardiovascular damage phenotypes and all-cause and CVD mortality in older adults.

Ann Epidemiol

School of Biological and Population Health Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR; Department of Epidemiology & Pop. Health, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford CA; School of Biological and Population Health Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.

Published: November 2021

Purpose: The association between CVD risk factors and mortality is well established, however, current tools for addressing subgroups have focused on the overall burden of disease. The identification of risky combinations of characteristics may lead to a better understanding of physiologic pathways that underlie morbidity and mortality in older adults.

Methods: Participants included 5067 older adults from the Cardiovascular Health Study, followed for up to 6 years. Using latent class analysis (LCA), we created CV damage phenotypes based on probabilities of abnormal brain infarctions, major echocardiogram abnormalities, N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide, troponin T, interleukin-6, c reactive-protein, galectin-3, cystatin C. We assigned class descriptions based on the probability of having an abnormality among risk factors, such that a healthy phenotype would have low probabilities in all risk factors. Participants were assigned to phenotypes based on the maximum probability of membership. We used Cox-proportional hazards regression to evaluate the association between the categorical CV damage phenotype and all-cause and CVD-mortality.

Results: The analysis yielded 5 CV damage phenotypes consistent with the following descriptions: healthy (59%), cardio-renal (11%), cardiac (15%), multisystem morbidity (6%), and inflammatory (9%). All four phenotypes were statistically associated with a greater risk of all-cause mortality when compared with the healthy phenotype. The multisystem morbidity phenotype had the greatest risk of all-cause death (HR: 4.02; 95% CI: 3.44, 4.70), and CVD-mortality (HR: 4.90, 95% CI: 3.95, 6.06).

Conclusions: Five CV damage phenotypes emerged from CVD risk factor measures. CV damage across multiple systems confers a greater mortality risk compared to damage in any single domain.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8562895PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.07.012DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

damage phenotypes
16
risk factors
12
mortality older
8
older adults
8
cvd risk
8
phenotypes based
8
healthy phenotype
8
multisystem morbidity
8
risk all-cause
8
risk
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!