Objectives: To evaluate the status of teaching of repair of defective resin-based composite restorations in dental schools in the Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) countries.
Methods: A validated 14-item questionnaire was mailed to the directors of the operative/restorative dentistry department in 40 MENA dental schools. Data were collected on teaching, including whether the repair of resin-based composite restorations was part of the dental school curriculum; the rationale behind the teaching; how techniques were taught, indications for repair, operative techniques, materials used, patient acceptability and expected longevity of the repair procedure.
Results: Thirty-two schools responded to the survey (response rate of 80%). Twenty-two (69%) schools reported the teaching of resin-based composite repairs as an alternative to the replacement of restorations. Of the schools not teaching repairs, 80% indicated that they plan to include this topic in the curriculum within the next five years. Most schools taught theoretical and practical aspects of repair at a clinical level only. Two-thirds of schools reported tooth substance preservation being the main reason for teaching repair techniques. The main indications for repair treatment were marginal defects (59%), followed by partial loss of restoration (56%). Most schools that performed repairs reported high patient acceptability. Considerable variation was noted in relation to expected longevity of resin- based composite repairs.
Conclusions: The repair of defective resin-based composite restorations is actively taught within most of the surveyed schools. Advantages of repair, compared to replacement include minimum intervention, preservation of tooth structure, and savings of time and cost.
Clinical Significance: The decision between replacing or repairing a defective resin-based composite restoration in the MENA region tends to be based on clinicians' subjective experience and judgement. However, to further enhance the teaching of resin-based composite repair standardised guidelines need to be developed based on existing evidence.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103753 | DOI Listing |
J Dent
December 2024
Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ). Rodolpho Paulo Rocco, 325, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. ZIP Code: 21941-617. Electronic address:
Objectives: To identify and map the literature on the current state of pH-triggered strategies for resin-based materials used in direct restorative dentistry, focusing on innovative compounds, their incorporation and evaluation methods, and the main outcomes.
Data And Sources: Through a search across PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, LILACS, Cochrane Library databases, and Google Scholar, this review identified studies pertinent to pH-responsive dental materials, excluding resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
Study Selection: From the 981 records identified, 19 in vitro studies were included, concentrating on resin-based composite resins (50%), dentin adhesives (25%), and sealants (25%).
BMC Oral Health
December 2024
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Objective: To assess the color stability and surface roughness of bioactive resin-based composite following exposure to coffee staining and brushing with whitening toothpastes.
Methods: Disk-shaped specimens of Filtek Z250 (FZ), Beautifil Flow Plus (BFP), Activa Presto (AP), and Fuji II LC (FII) were stained with coffee and then brushed with one of three toothpastes, conventional (C-TP), non-peroxide whitening (W-TP) or hydrogen peroxide-containing whitening toothpaste (HPW-TP) for 10 000 cycles. Changes in color (ΔE) and surface roughness were measured.
Int J Prosthodont
December 2024
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the hydrolytic behavior of different computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) resin matrix ceramics (RMCs) in different food-simulating liquids (FSLs).
Materials And Methods: Five different CAD/CAM blocks, one from polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks (PICNs; Vita Enamic (EN)) and four from resin-based composites (RBCs; Lava Ultimate (UL), Cerasmart (CER), Brilliant Crios (BR), and Block HC (HC)) were selected. Forty specimens were prepared for each material, and they randomly distributed to each FSLs.
BMC Oral Health
December 2024
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Ordu University, Ordu, Turkey.
Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of different types of bleaching methods and repolishing on the whiteness index and staining susceptibility of additive and subtractive production resin-based materials and direct composite resins.
Methods: In this study, a total of 96 samples (8*8*2m) were prepared using a nanohybrid composite resin (Neo Spectra-ST (NS)), a subtractive-manufactured nanoceramic resin (Cerasmart270 (CS)), and an additive-manufactured permanent resin (Saremco print Crowntec (CT)). The samples were randomly divided into four treatment groups: control (distilled water, 14 days), in-office bleaching (Opalescence Boost-40% HP, 3*20min), at-home bleaching (Opalescence PF-16% CP, 6 h, 14 days), and toothpaste group (Opalescence Whitening, 2*5min, 14 days) (n:8).
Purpose: This study aims to compare the surface roughness (SR), contact angle (CA), surface free energy (SFE), and bacterial adhesion of resin-based materials used in additive, subtractive, and conventional manufacturing techniques.
Materials And Methods: This study involved four groups of 23 specimens: Indirect conventional resin composite (ICRC), subtractively manufactured resin composite (SMRC), additively manufactured resin composite (AMRC), and soda-lime-silica glass (SLSG). One specimen per group was analyzed by Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) before polishing.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!