A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Evaluation of a subunit vaccine candidate (Biotech Vac Cox) against Eimeria spp. in broiler chickens. | LitMetric

Evaluation of a subunit vaccine candidate (Biotech Vac Cox) against Eimeria spp. in broiler chickens.

Poult Sci

Vetanco SA, Villa Martelli B1603, Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina; Vetanco USA, Saint Paul, MN 55114, USA; BV Science, Lenexa, KS 66219, USA. Electronic address:

Published: September 2021

This study evaluated growth performance and cross-protection against Eimeria spp. using a subunit coccidia vaccine in 2 independent challenge experiments. In both trials, chickens were challenged with E. acervulina, E. maxima, and E. tenella oocysts. In Exp 1, 1000-day-old chickens were allocated in one of 2 treatments 1) Control group; 2) Biotech Vac Cox group. The vaccine was orally gavaged on d 2 and 16 of life and coccidia challenge was on d 21. Performance parameters were evaluated on d 21, 35, and 42. On d 34, coccidia lesions were scored. Oocysts per gram of feces (OPG) were evaluated on d 28, 35, and 42. In Exp 2, 900-day-old chickens were assigned in one of 2 treatments 1) Control group; 2) Biotech Vac Cox group. The vaccine was orally gavaged on d 2 and 16 of life and coccidia challenge was on d 21. Performance parameters were evaluated on d 21, 27, 35, and 42, and lesion scores and OPG at d 27. In Exp 1, chickens vaccinated had significantly lower feed intake (FI) at d 21 and feed conversion ratio (FCR) at d 35 compared to control chickens (P < 0.05). Vaccinated chickens showed a significant reduction (P ≤ 0.05) in OPG for E. maxima to nondetectable levels and for all coccidian species at d 42 compared to control chickens. In Exp 2, the chickens vaccinated showed a significant increase in BW, BW gain (BWG) and reduction in FCR on d 27, 35, and 42 (P ≤ 0.05). Vaccinated chickens had significantly lower (P ≤ 0.05) lesion scores for all 3 Eimeria species. Moreover, vaccinated chickens had a reduction in total OPG of 35.50% (P = 0.0739). Studies to evaluate the serological and mucosal immune response are currently being evaluated. This inactivated, orally delivered subunit vaccine offers significant cross-protection to Eimeria spp. and eliminates the needs to treat broilers with live oocysts, enhanced ease of use, and greater biosecurity to producers.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8342787PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101329DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

biotech vac
12
vac cox
12
eimeria spp
12
vaccinated chickens
12
≤ 005
12
chickens
11
subunit vaccine
8
cross-protection eimeria
8
treatments control
8
control group
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!