A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Distinct opposing associations of upper and lower body fat depots with metabolic and cardiovascular disease risk markers. | LitMetric

Background: To examine the associations of total and regional adiposity with metabolic and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk markers.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 1080 (53.8% men, aged 39-44 years) individuals from South India. Anthropometry (height, weight, waist and hip circumference), body composition assessment using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), blood pressure (BP), and plasma glucose, insulin and lipids were measured. Regression analysis was used to examine associations of standardized fat measurements with type 2 diabetes (T2D), insulin resistance (IR), hypertension and hypertriglyceridemia and continuous measurements of BP, glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR and lipids. Contour plots were constructed to visualize the differential effect of upper and lower fat depots.

Results: DXA-measured fat depots were positively associated with metabolic and CVD risk markers. After adjusting for fat mass index, upper body fat remained positively, while lower body fat was negatively associated with risk markers. A one standard deviation (SD) increase in android fat showed higher odds ratios (ORs) for T2D (6.59; 95% CI 3.17, 13.70), IR (4.68; 95% CI 2.31, 9.50), hypertension (2.57; 95% CI 1.56, 4.25) and hypertriglyceridemia (6.39; 95% CI 3.46, 11.90) in men. A 1 SD increase in leg fat showed a protective effect with ORs for T2D (0.42; 95% CI 0.24, 0.74), IR (0.31; 95% CI 0.17, 0.57) and hypertriglyceridemia (0.61; 95% CI 0.38, 0.98). The magnitude of the effect was greater with DXA-measured fat compared with anthropometry.

Conclusion: At any level of total body fat, upper and lower body fat depots demonstrate opposite risk associations with metabolic and CVD risk markers in Asian Indians.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41366-021-00923-1DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

body fat
20
risk markers
16
upper lower
12
lower body
12
fat
12
fat depots
12
cvd risk
12
metabolic cardiovascular
8
cardiovascular disease
8
examine associations
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!