Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objectives: This study was performed to investigate the short-term and long-term survival of patients who underwent reoperative tricuspid valve replacement (TVR).
Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed of 273 patients who underwent TVRs while hospitalised in Beijing Anzhen Hospital from November 1993 to August 2018. Fifty-six (56) of them underwent reoperative TVR: 36 had previous tricuspid valve repair and 20 had previous TVR. Follow-up was 100% complete, with a mean follow-up of 8 years (range, 1-15 years).
Results: The overall in-hospital mortality was 17.9% (n=10). In the univariate analysis, the overall in-hospital mortality and renal failure rate in the replacement group were lower than those in the repair group (5.0% vs 25%; p=0.046 and 27.8% vs 5%; p=0.040). However, in-hospital mortality was no longer statistically significant after multivariate adjustment (adjusted OR 0.318; 95% CI 0.030-3.338; p=0.340). There was no significant difference in survival between the patients with previous repair and those with previous replacement (log-rank test, p=0.839). Factors that correlated with long-term mortality on multivariate analysis were age >60 years (adjusted HR 11.753; 95% CI 1.686-81.915; p=0.013); cardiopulmonary bypass time (adjusted HR 1.019; 95% CI 1.005-1.034; p=0.009); intensive care unit time (adjusted HR 1.024; 95% CI 1.006-1.042; p=0.009); and ventilation time (adjusted HR 0.982; 95% CI 0.965-0.998; p=0.030).
Conclusions: Reoperative TVR was associated with high in-hospital mortality and morbidity. Overall in-hospital mortality was similar between the previous replacement group and the previous repair group. Previous tricuspid valve repair and replacement had similar long-term survival.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2021.06.520 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!