A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Intrarater Reliability of Digital Thermography in Detecting Pin Site Infection: A Proof of Concept Study. | LitMetric

Intrarater Reliability of Digital Thermography in Detecting Pin Site Infection: A Proof of Concept Study.

Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr

Department of Orthopaedics, Interdisciplinary Orthopaedics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.

Published: January 2021

Aim And Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore the capability and Intrarater reliability of thermography in detecting pin site infection.

Materials And Methods: This is an explorative proof of concept study. Clinical assessment of pin sites was performed by one examiner with the Modified Gordon Pin Infection Classification from grade 0 to 6. Thermography of the pin sites was performed with a FLIR C3 camera. The analysis of the thermographic images was done in the software FLIR Tools. The maximum skin temperature around the pin site and the maximum temperature for the whole thermographic picture were measured. An Intrarater agreement was established and test-retests were performed with different camera angles.

Results: Thirteen (four females, nine males) patients (age 9-72 years) were included. Indications for frames: Fracture (=4), two deformity correction, one lengthening and six bone transport. Days from surgery to thermography ranged from 27 to 385 days. Overall, 231 pin sites were included. Eleven pin sites were diagnosed with early signs of infection: five grade 1, five grade 2 and one grade 3. Mean pin site temperature for each patient was calculated, varied between patients from 29.0°C to 35.4°C (mean 33.9°C). With 34°C as cut-off value for infection, sensitivity was 73%; specificity, 67%; positive predictive value, 10%; and negative predictive value, 98%. Intrarater agreement for thermography was ICC 0.85 (0.77-0.92). The temperature measured was influenced by the camera positioning in relation to the pin site with a variance of 0.2.

Conclusions: Measurements of pin site temperature using the hand-held FLIR C3 infrared camera was a reliable method and the temperature was related to infection grading.

Clinical Significance: This study demonstrated that digital thermography with a hand-held camera might be used for monitoring the pin sites after operations to detect early infection.

How To Cite This Article: Rahbek O, Husum HC, Fridberg M, Intrarater Reliability of Digital Thermography in Detecting Pin Site Infection: A Proof of Concept Study. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2021;16(1):1-7.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8311748PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1522DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pin site
28
pin sites
20
pin
13
intrarater reliability
12
digital thermography
12
thermography detecting
12
detecting pin
12
proof concept
12
concept study
12
reliability digital
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!