Background And Purpose: The Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) Council refined the APN peer review to an objective, data-driven process. The purpose of the study was to assess the interrater reliability of APN peer reviews using the APN Rubric based on Hamric, Spross & Hanson's Model of Advanced Practice Nursing.
Methods: A quantitative single-site study with a convenience sample of 80 APN Portfolios.
Results: Analysis of six core competencies (direct clinical practice, leadership, consultation/collaboration, coaching/guiding, research, and ethical decision-making) within the APN Rubric demonstrated substantial and near perfect agreement levels in the APN peer review process.
Conclusions: The application of APN core competencies within the peer review process demonstrated high consistency, thereby increasing the significance and objectivity of peer review outcomes.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/JNM-D-20-00015 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!