Purpose: Many patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) required critical care. Mid-term outcomes of the survivors need to be assessed. The objective of this single-center cohort study was to describe their physical, cognitive, psychological, and biological outcomes at 3 months following intensive care unit (ICU)-discharge (M3).

Patients And Methods: All COVID-19 adults who survived an ICU stay ≥ 7 days and attended the M3 consultation at our multidisciplinary follow-up clinic were involved. They benefited from a standardized assessment, addressing health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-3L), sleep disorders (PSQI), and the three principal components of post-intensive care syndrome (PICS): physical status (Barthel index, handgrip and quadriceps strength), mental health disorders (HADS and IES-R), and cognitive impairment (MoCA). Biological parameters referred to C-reactive protein and creatinine.

Results: Among the 92 patients admitted to our ICU for COVID-19, 42 survived a prolonged ICU stay and 32 (80%) attended the M3 follow-up visit. Their median age was 62 [49-68] years, 72% were male, and nearly half received inpatient rehabilitation following ICU discharge. At M3, 87.5% (28/32) had not regained their baseline level of daily activities. Only 6.2% (2/32) fully recovered, and had normal scores for the three MoCA, IES-R and Barthel scores. The main observed disorders were PSQI > 5 (75%, 24/32), MoCA < 26 (44%, 14/32), Barthel < 100 (31%, 10/32) and IES-R ≥ 33 (28%, 9/32). Combined disorders were observed in 13/32 (40.6%) of the patients. The EQ-5D-3L visual scale was rated at 71 [61-80]. A quarter of patients (8/32) demonstrated a persistent inflammation based on CRP blood level (9.3 [6.8-17.7] mg/L).

Conclusion: The burden of severe COVID-19 and prolonged ICU stay was considerable in the present cohort after 3 months, affecting both functional status and biological parameters. These data are an argument on the need for closed follow-up for critically ill COVID-19 survivors.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8319705PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-021-00910-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

post-intensive care
8
care syndrome
8
cohort study
8
follow-up clinic
8
syndrome critical
4
covid-19
4
critical covid-19
4
covid-19 cohort
4
study belgian
4
belgian follow-up
4

Similar Publications

Background: Patients discharged from the intensive care unit (ICU) can experience post-intensive care syndrome (PICS), which is comprised of cognitive, physical and psychological impairments.

Aim: The objective of this study was to identify the prevalence of and risk factors associated with all three domains of PICS at the first and third month after ICU discharge.

Design: A prospective descriptive-analytic study was conducted in two ICUs of a Chinese university hospital.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: More self-efficacy leads to greater confidence in one's ability to perform actions to achieve treatment goals. Therefore, self-efficacy may affect patient recovery and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after ICU discharge.

Aim: In a cohort of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 survivors, we examined the associations between self-efficacy at 3 months and HRQoL at 3, 12 and 24 months after discharge.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Estimated prevalence of post-intensive care cognitive impairment at short-term and long-term follow-ups: a proportional meta-analysis of observational studies.

Ann Intensive Care

January 2025

School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 5/F, 3 Sassoon Road, Academic Building, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.

Objective: Evidence of the overall estimated prevalence of post-intensive care cognitive impairment among critically ill survivors discharged from intensive care units at short-term and long-term follow-ups is lacking. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of the post-intensive care cognitive impairment at time to < 1 month, 1 to 3 month(s), 4 to 6 months, 7-12 months, and > 12 months discharged from intensive care units.

Methods: Electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, Web of Science, and PsycINFO via ProQuest were searched from inception through July 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed how enhanced rehabilitation after hospital discharge affects the quality of life (QOL) for survivors of critical care, following PRISMA guidelines and examining data from several major health databases until January 2024.
  • The review included nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 573 participants, finding that enhanced rehabilitation showed no significant improvement in physical QOL but did result in a higher mental QOL score (low-certainty evidence).
  • Adverse events' impact was uncertain, with mixed reports from the studies; some had no adverse events, while others noted serious incidents, indicating very low-certainty evidence on this issue.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Understanding the degree to which patients are actively involved, confident and capable of engaging with self-management and rehabilitation could be an initial step in guiding individualised supportive strategies for people after critical illness.

Aims: To assess the levels of active involvement with self management among ICU survivors using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM), explore associations between patient characteristics and PAM results, and investigate its relationship with patients' support needs at key transition points during the recovery process.

Methods: Eligible participants received both the PAM and Support Needs After Critical care (SNAC) questionnaires by post.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!