A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Pharmacokinetics and safety of niraparib in patients with moderate hepatic impairment. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aims to analyze how the drug niraparib behaves (pharmacokinetics) and its safety in patients with normal liver function compared to those with moderate liver impairment.
  • Patients with advanced solid tumors were divided based on their liver function, and both groups received different dosages of niraparib to determine its effects.
  • Results showed that patients with moderate hepatic impairment had higher drug exposure but similar safety compared to those with normal liver function, suggesting a lower starting dose of 200 mg for those with impaired liver function.

Article Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to characterize niraparib pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety in patients with normal hepatic function (NHF) versus moderate hepatic impairment (MHI).

Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors were stratified by NHF or MHI (National Cancer Institute-Organ Dysfunction Working Group criteria [bilirubin > 1.5-3 × upper limit of normal and any aspartate aminotransferase elevation]). In the PK phase, all patients received one 300 mg dose of niraparib. In the extension phase, patients with MHI received niraparib 200 mg daily; patients with NHF received 200 or 300 mg based on weight (< 77 kg, ≥ 77 kg)/platelets (< 150,000/µL, ≥ 150,000/µL). PK parameters included maximum concentration (C), area under the curve to last measured concentration (AUC) and extrapolated to infinity (AUC). Safety was assessed in both phases. Exposure-response (E-R) modeling was used to predict MHI effects on exposure and safety of niraparib doses ≤ 200 mg or 300/200 mg or 200/100 mg weight/platelet regimens.

Results: In the PK phase (NHF, n = 9; MHI, n = 8), mean niraparib C was 7% lower in patients with MHI versus NHF. Mean exposure (AUC, AUC) was increased by 45% and 56%, respectively, in patients with MHI without impacting tolerability. In the extension phase (NHF, n = 8; MHI, n = 7), the overall safety profile was consistent with previous trials. In patients with MHI, E-R modeling predicted niraparib 200 mg reduced Grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia incidence, whereas a 200/100 mg regimen yielded exposures below efficacy-associated levels in 15% of patients.

Conclusion: These findings support adjusting the 300 mg niraparib starting dose to 200 mg QD in patients with MHI.

Trial Registration: NCT03359850; registered December 2, 2017.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8484145PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00280-021-04329-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pharmacokinetics safety
8
moderate hepatic
8
hepatic impairment
8
phase patients
8
patients
6
niraparib
4
safety niraparib
4
niraparib patients
4
patients moderate
4
impairment purpose
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!