Combined biological and physicochemical process was selected for treatment of laundry wastewater. The results show that after microbial adaptation, almost 91% of COD was removed at food to microorganism (F/M) ratio of 0.12 gBOD/gMLSS·d. Dehydrogenase activity of the biomass showed an increasing trend and finally reached 3.8 μgTFg.d corresponding to the highest process performance. 16SrRNA fragment and phylogenetic analysis identified Pseudomonas pharmacofabricae and Bacillus spp. as the dominant bacteria. The effluent of the biological process was then injected into the UV/O process for complete removal of residual COD and detergent. Finally, microfiltration and ultrafiltration were used to remove any remaining suspended solids. The operating cost analysis showed that 0.65 €/m treated wastewater is required for treatment of the laundry wastewater. Accordingly, the suggested combination of the biological and physicochemical process could be a promising and highly efficient process for treatment and reuse of laundry wastewater.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148068 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Influence of interelectrode distances in electrocoagulation: is there any possibility and advantages to operate at micro-distances with low-conductivity effluents?
Chemosphere
November 2024
Treewater, 61 Rue de la République, 62009, Lyon, France.
Article Synopsis
- This study explores the use of micro-inter-electrode distances in electrocoagulation to enhance treatment and energy efficiency for low-conductivity laundry wastewater.
- The research analyzed how different interelectrode distances, current densities, and anode materials impacted the removal rates of pollutants like paracetamol and total organic carbon.
- Findings show that while micro-distances reduced energy consumption significantly, they also resulted in increased sludge production, highlighting a trade-off in using different electrode materials for optimal performance.
Surfactants can compete with microplastics for surfaces using adhesives as substrates for microplastic sequestration.
Environ Pollut
January 2025
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, 2300 Hayward Street, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2117, USA. Electronic address:
Experimental efforts supplemented by modeling gauged whether common additives found in soaps and laundry detergents interfered with polyacrylate adhesive-based capture of microplastics. On the experimental front, poly(2-ethylhexyl acrylate) (PEHA) samples were evaluated using gravimetric analysis, probe tack, and functional assessments of adhesive-coated glass slides immersed into DI water solutions containing both microparticles and additives (solvents, softeners, and non-ionic surfactants). Nylon-6 spheres and polyethylene terephthalate microplastics were chosen for adsorption using a count-based method by ImageJ imaging analysis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFApplication of central composite design for commercial laundry wastewater treatment by packed bed electrocoagulation using sacrificial iron electrodes.
Chemosphere
November 2024
BOSK-Bioproducts, 100-399 rue jacquard, Quebec, QC, G1N4J6, Canada; Research Centre for Eco-Environmental Engineering, Dongguan University of Technology, China.
This research paper deals with a novel method utilizing packed bed electrocoagulation (PBEC) comprising of sacrificial iron electrodes and coupled with extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) used as flocculent agents for the treatment of commercial laundry wastewater (LWW). The study employs stainless steel cathodes, graphite anodes, and scrap iron pieces as sacrificial electrodes, ensuring efficient treatment in dynamic batch mode operation with enhanced contact time facilitated by serpentine flow. The initial characteristics of LWW were COD 579 ± 30 mg/L, TSS of 60 ± 10 mg/L, TS of 622 ± 20 mg/L, turbidity of 110 ± 5 NTU, pH of 9 ± 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFQuantification of textile microfibers from laundry wastewater using the Rock-Eval® device: Difference between natural and synthetic microfiber origin.
Sci Total Environ
December 2024
IFP Énergies nouvelles (IFPEN), Rond-point de l'échangeur de Solaize, BP3, 69360 Solaize, France.
Synthetic textiles constitute a significant emission source of microplastics into the environment release by mechanical abrasion during laundering. Only a portion of these microfibers is retained in wastewater treatment plants, and major issues to identify and quantify microfibers remain because of their nature, shape, and size. Most widespread natural (cotton, linen) and synthetic (polyester PET, nylon polyamide PA, viscose) textiles were first analyzed using a pyrolysis and oxidation based-method: the Rock-Eval® device.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMicroplastic retention in green walls for nature-based and decentralized greywater treatment.
Environ Pollut
December 2024
Water, Energy and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Technology, 90014, University of Oulu, Finland.
In wastewater treatment, two issues have recently received increased attention: nature-based solutions for addressing urban water stress through decentralized treatment and re-use; and emerging pollutants such as microplastics (MPs). At the interface of these, this study investigated living green walls for greywater treatment and their potential for MP removal. A large, pilot-scale green wall was irrigated with greywater (a mix of water collected from laundry, dishwasher, bathroom sinks, and synthetic greywater), and effluent from planted and unplanted sections was compared.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!