Limb dominance is evident in many daily activities, leading to the prominent idea that each hemisphere of the brain specializes in controlling different aspects of movement. Past studies suggest that the dominant arm is primarily controlled via an internal model of limb dynamics that enables the nervous system to produce efficient movements. In contrast, the nondominant arm may be primarily controlled via impedance mechanisms that rely on the strong modulation of sensory feedback from individual joints to control limb posture. We tested whether such differences are evident in behavioral responses and stretch reflexes following sudden displacement of the arm during posture control. applied specific combinations of elbow-shoulder torque perturbations (the same for all participants). Peak joint displacements, return times, end point accuracy, and the directional tuning and amplitude of stretch reflexes in nearly all muscles were not statistically different between the two arms. induced specific combinations of joint motion (the same for all participants). Again, peak joint displacements, return times, end point accuracy, and the directional tuning and amplitude of stretch reflexes in nearly all muscles did not differ statistically when countering the imposed loads with each arm. Moderate to strong correlations were found between stretch reflexes and behavioral responses to the perturbations with the two arms across both experiments. Collectively, the results do not support the idea that the dominant arm specializes in exploiting internal models and the nondominant arm in impedance control by increasing reflex gains to counter sudden loads imposed on the arms during posture control. A prominent hypothesis is that the nervous system controls the dominant arm through predictive internal models and the nondominant arm through impedance mechanisms. We tested whether stretch reflexes of muscles in the two arms also display such specialization during posture control. Nearly all behavioral responses and stretch reflexes did not differ statistically but were strongly correlated between the arms. The results indicate individual signatures of feedback control that are common for the two arms.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00152.2021DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

stretch reflexes
28
dominant arm
12
nondominant arm
12
behavioral responses
12
posture control
12
reflexes muscles
12
reflexes behavioral
8
control limb
8
arm
8
arm controlled
8

Similar Publications

Voltage-sensitive calcium channels contribute to depolarization of both motor- and interneurons in animal studies, but less is known of their contribution to human motor control and whether blocking them has potential in future antispasmodic treatment in humans. Therefore, this study investigated the acute effect of Nimodipine on the transmission of human spinal reflex pathways involved in spasticity. In a double-blinded, cross-over study, we measured soleus muscle stretch- and H-reflexes, and tibialis anterior cutaneous reflexes in nineteen healthy subjects before and after Nimodipine (tab-let 60mg) or Baclofen (tablet 25mg).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Central mechanisms of muscle tone regulation: implications for pain and performance.

Front Neurosci

December 2024

Department of Psychology and Communication, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, United States.

Muscle tone represents a foundational property of the motor system with the potential to impact musculoskeletal pain and motor performance. Muscle tone is involuntary, dynamically adaptive, interconnected across the body, sensitive to postural demands, and distinct from voluntary control. Research has historically focused on pathological tone, peripheral regulation, and contributions from passive tissues, without consideration of the neural regulation of active tone and its consequences, particularly for neurologically healthy individuals.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • This study investigates how the brain and spinal reflexes work together to activate muscles during arm movements, using EMG data to analyze the patterns of muscle activation.
  • Findings reveal that during the initial phase of movement, brain and muscle activations align, but they start to diverge as the movement continues, displaying different patterns based on the speed of the movement.
  • The results indicate that while spinal reflexes significantly contribute to movement generation, the brain must adapt its activation patterns based on the dynamics of the movement (e.g., slow vs. fast).
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!