AI Article Synopsis

  • * Most patients begin with non-surgical treatments, but if these are ineffective, various minimally invasive surgical options are available that have shown promise in small studies.
  • * Treatment decisions depend on factors such as the patient's symptoms, the specifics of the fracture, and the experience of the surgeon involved.

Article Abstract

An increasing incidence of sacral insufficiency fractures in geriatric patients has been documented, representing a major challenge to our healthcare system. Determining the accurate diagnosis requires the use of sectional imaging, including computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Initially, non-surgical treatment is indicated for the majority of patients. If non-surgical treatment fails, several minimally invasive therapeutic strategies can be used, which have shown promising results in small case series. These approaches are sacroplasty, percutaneous iliosacral screw fixation (S1 with or without S2), trans-sacral screw fixation or implantation of a trans-sacral bar, transiliac internal fixator stabilisation, and spinopelvic stabilisation. These surgical strategies and their indications are reported in detail. Generally, treatment-related decision making depends on the clinical presentation, fracture morphology, and attending surgeon's experience.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1498-2975DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

minimally invasive
8
sacral insufficiency
8
insufficiency fractures
8
non-surgical treatment
8
screw fixation
8
current minimally
4
invasive surgical
4
surgical concepts
4
concepts sacral
4
fractures increasing
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!