Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Visual recognition performance of right or left hemispheric damaged subjects and of a healthy control group was investigated under three modes of stimulus presentation: normal, sequential, or fragmentary. Stimuli were faces or not easily verbalizable so-called Perret-figures. A dissociation between side of brain damage and performance under sequential vs normal item presentation was found: similar to control subjects, left hemispheric damaged patients remembered previously seen stimuli better under normal presentation, while right brain damaged subjects were superior in performance under sequential compared to normal stimulus presentation. These results may be of relevance for therapeutical interventions with respect to learning and remembering figural material in right brain damaged subjects.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(87)90117-5 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!