AI Article Synopsis

  • The study enrolled 1100 individuals with serious mental illness in Greater Boston to evaluate two tobacco cessation interventions: academic detailing for primary care providers and community health worker support for smokers.
  • The objective is to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation of these interventions, analyze differences among primary care providers, and recognize anticipated challenges from various stakeholders.
  • The research will utilize qualitative interviews and the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, focusing on a systematic approach to data collection and analysis to understand both qualitative and quantitative outcomes.

Article Abstract

Background: Tobacco smoking is associated with significant morbidity and premature mortality in individuals with serious mental illness. A 2-year pragmatic clinical trial (PCORI PCS-1504-30472) that enrolled 1100 individuals with serious mental illness in the greater Boston area was conducted to test 2 interventions for tobacco cessation for individuals with serious mental illness: (1) academic detailing, which delivers education to primary care providers and highlights first-line pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation, and (2) provision of community health worker support to smoker participants. Implementing and scaling this intervention in other settings will require the systematic identification of barriers and facilitators, as well as the identification of relevant subgroups, effective and unique components, and setting-specific factors.

Objective: This protocol outlines the proposed mixed methods evaluation of the pragmatic clinical trial to (1) identify barriers and facilitators to effective implementation of the interventions, (2) examine group differences among primary care physicians, and (3) identify barriers that stakeholders such as clinical, payor, and policy leaders would anticipate to impact the implementation of effective components of the intervention.

Methods: Qualitative interviews will be conducted with all study community health workers and selected smoker participants, primary care providers, and other stakeholders. Measures of performance and engagement will guide purposive sampling. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research will guide qualitative data collection and analysis in accordance with the following framework approach: (1) familiarization, (2) identifying a thematic framework, (3) indexing, (4) charting, and (5) mapping and interpretation. Joint display analyses will be constructed to analyze and draw conclusions across the quantitative and qualitative data.

Results: The 3-year cluster-randomized trial has concluded, and the analysis of primary outcomes is underway. Results from the pragmatic trial and this mixed methods implementation evaluation will be used to help disseminate, scale, and expand a systems intervention.

Conclusions: The results of this mixed methods implementation evaluation will inform strategies for dissemination and solutions to potential barriers to the implementation of interventions from a smoking cessation trial for individuals with serious mental illness.

International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/25390.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8367188PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/25390DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

serious mental
20
mental illness
16
mixed methods
16
individuals serious
16
smoking cessation
12
methods implementation
12
implementation evaluation
12
primary care
12
pragmatic clinical
8
clinical trial
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!