Ideally, a meta-analysis will summarize data from several unbiased studies. Here we look into the less than ideal situation in which contributing studies may be compromised by non-differential measurement error in the exposure variable. Specifically, we consider a meta-analysis for the association between a continuous outcome variable and one or more continuous exposure variables, where the associations may be quantified as regression coefficients of a linear regression model. A flexible Bayesian framework is developed which allows one to obtain appropriate point and interval estimates with varying degrees of prior knowledge about the magnitude of the measurement error. We also demonstrate how, if individual-participant data (IPD) are available, the Bayesian meta-analysis model can adjust for multiple participant-level covariates, these being measured with or without measurement error.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1515DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

measurement error
20
bayesian framework
8
continuous outcome
8
non-differential measurement
8
measurement
5
meta-analysis
4
error meta-analysis
4
meta-analysis mema-a
4
mema-a bayesian
4
framework continuous
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!