Introduction And Aims: Colonoscopy quality is measured by the degree in which the examination increases the likelihood of obtaining adequate results on health. Our aim was to develop an instrument for evaluating the quality of screening colonoscopies, taking into account the performance of endoscopists and endoscopy units.

Materials And Methods: Mixed methodology was employed. The first stage (qualitative) consisted of a Medline search, from which a group of experts developed the quality score items. The second stage (quantitative) utilized a modified Delphi technique to reach consensus (3 rounds). We evaluated the psychometric properties of the instrument (reliability and construct validity) in elective screening colonoscopies (in patients≥50 years of age), performed within the January-April 2017 time frame.

Results: A final instrument with 8 items was produced: 1) the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score; 2) cecal intubation rate; 3) colonoscopy withdrawal time; 4) image documentation; 5) adenoma detection rate; 6) endoscopic surveillance planning; 7) perforation rate, and 8) continuous improvement programs. The instrument was evaluated in 323 colonoscopies performed by 31 endoscopists and found to be one-dimensional and reliable (Cronbach's alpha 0.76). Performance was compared between endoscopists (center 1) and an expert endoscopist from another center (center 2): Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score 8.3 vs. 7.36 (P<.001), cecal intubation rate 93.5 vs. 96%, colonoscopy withdrawal time 14.8 vs. 8.4min (P<.001), and adenoma detection rate 34 vs. 52.2% (P<.001), respectively.

Conclusion: The Colonoscopy Quality Score is a reliable and valid instrument for evaluating screening colonoscopy quality. Its results could be adapted to the usual endoscopic report to adjust monitorization frequency post-colonoscopy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rgmx.2021.01.011DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

colonoscopy quality
12
psychometric properties
8
quality score
8
screening colonoscopies
8
boston bowel
8
bowel preparation
8
preparation scale
8
scale score
8
quality
5
instrument
5

Similar Publications

Background: Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs), now known as disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBIs), such as Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) and Functional Dyspepsia (FD), significantly impact global health, reducing quality of life and burdening healthcare systems. This study addresses the epidemiological gap in Poland, focusing on the West Pomeranian Voivodeship.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 2070 Caucasian patients (58.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Derivation and validation of a prediction model for inadequate bowel preparation in Chinese outpatients.

Sci Rep

January 2025

Nursing Department, The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Building 17, 3rd Floor 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310003, China.

The quality of bowel preparation is an important factor in the success of colonoscopy. However, multiple influencing factors that function together can lead to inadequate bowel preparation. The main objective of this study was to explore the specific factors that affect the quality of bowel preparation, with the goal of deriving and validating a predictive model for inadequate bowel preparation in Chinese outpatients.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

British Society of Gastroenterology National Evaluation of Colonoscopy Quality: Findings from the National Endoscopy Database.

Gastrointest Endosc

January 2025

Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK, NE2 4AX; North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, TS19 8PE.

Background And Aims: Analysis of national colonoscopy quality using automatically uploaded data from a national database, including exploring performance variation.

Methods: Data on all colonoscopies performed in the UK 01/03/2019-29/02/2020 and recorded in the National Endoscopy Database were analysed. Unadjusted key performance indicators were calculated and proportions of endoscopists achieving national standards were determined.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Artificial intelligence (AI) tools for histological diagnosis offer great potential to healthcare, yet failure to understand their clinical context is delaying adoption. IGUANA (Interpretable Gland-Graphs using a Neural Aggregator) is an AI algorithm that can effectively classify colonic biopsies into normal versus abnormal categories, designed to automatically report normal cases. We performed a retrospective pathological and clinical review of the errors made by IGUANA.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the United States. Early detection through colonoscopy significantly improves survival rates. Detecting colon polyps depends on the quality of bowel preparation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!