AI Article Synopsis

  • Soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) agents were studied for their potential benefits in treating heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but recent trials (CAPACITY HFpEF and VITALITY-HFpEF) showed no improvements in key measures like the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) physical limitation score.
  • A meta-analysis and systematic review were conducted using data from these trials, analyzing a combined total of around 620 patients for 6MWT and 583 patients for KCCQ scores, but results showed no significant differences between sGC and placebo groups.
  • Safety analyses from four trials, involving nearly 1

Article Abstract

Soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) agents have been shown to have possible beneficial effects in heart failure treatment. Unfortunately, the role of sGC in HFpEF has not been shown to be efficacious based on recent trials. The CAPACITY HFpEF and VITALITY-HFpEF trials independently showed that sGC does not improve 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance or the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) physical limitation score (PLS). The objective of this study was to analyze current data on the 6MWT and KCCQ PLS score from trials that included patients with HFpEF treated with sGC. Using MEDLINE and Cochrane databases, meta-analysis and systematic review was performed looking at data in the CAPACITY HFpEF and VITALITY-HFpEF trials.  For safety analysis we evaluated serious adverse events between the CAPACITY HFpEF, VITALITY-HFpEF, SOCRATES-PRESERVED, and DILATE-1trials. A total of 2 trials were analyzed to assess 6MWT and KCCQ score. The total number of combined patients from both trials assessing 6MWT distance in sGC vs placebo therapy were 620 with 309 in the treatment group and 311 in the placebo group. The total number of combined patients from both trials assessing KCCQ score outcomes were 583 with 280 in the treatment group and 303 in the placebo group. A total of 4 trials were evaluated for safety analysis with a total of 987 patients with 529 in the treatment group and 458 in the placebo group. The analysis did not demonstrate significant difference in 6MWT (P = 0.97), KCCQ PLS (P = 0.83), or serious adverse events (P = 0.67).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2021.100924DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

capacity hfpef
12
hfpef vitality-hfpef
12
treatment group
12
placebo group
12
patients hfpef
8
trials
8
6mwt distance
8
6mwt kccq
8
kccq pls
8
safety analysis
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!