A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A Comparison of Collaborative Testing and Alternative Test-Taking Methods on Content Retention in Baccalaureate Nursing Students. | LitMetric

A Comparison of Collaborative Testing and Alternative Test-Taking Methods on Content Retention in Baccalaureate Nursing Students.

Nurs Educ Perspect

About the Authors Amy J. Witt, PhD, RN, CNE; Bethany J. Gerdin, PhD, RN, CNE; and Julie A. De Haan, EdD, RN, are associate professors, Department of Nursing, Bethel University, St. Paul, Minnesota. Lauren K. Bergman, BSN, RN, CCRN, is a student in the DNAP program at the Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina. Support for this study was received from Sigma Theta Tau International Chi At-Large. For more information, contact Dr. Gerdin at .

Published: June 2022

Nursing faculty look for ways to promote the retention of content so that students can build on that content and apply it to nursing practice. A study was designed to determine differences in content retention between testing collaboratively, which involves students taking an exam collectively within a small group, using an individual notecard, and including written rationale for test answers during collaborative testing. Students who tested collaboratively had significantly higher long-term content retention than students who tested with the other methods.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000856DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

content retention
12
collaborative testing
8
students tested
8
content
5
students
5
comparison collaborative
4
testing alternative
4
alternative test-taking
4
test-taking methods
4
methods content
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!