The current paper expands an under-addressed concept within the job insecurity literature, namely, whether threats to job security are specific to the jobholder (person-at-risk threats) or specific to the job (job-at-risk threats). Using a between-person experimental vignette design, 136 employed participants were asked to imagine themselves in either a Person-at-Risk or a Job-at-Risk scenario. As expected, participants in a person-at-risk scenario indicated more negative reactions to job insecurity, as captured by greater anticipated negative affect and poorer perceived social exchanges and organization-based self-esteem. They also reported reduced intention for interpersonal citizenship behavior and greater intention to engage in one form of impression management compared to individuals in a job-at-risk scenario. We interpret these findings in terms of their implications on individual versus group identity, as well as on well-being and the behavioral consequences of job insecurity.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8303430PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147379DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

job insecurity
12
threats job
8
job security
8
job-at-risk scenario
8
job
7
it's personal
4
personal differential
4
differential outcomes
4
outcomes person
4
person job
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!