The Effect of Facility Volume on Survival Following Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer.

J Gastrointest Surg

Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, MA, 02115, Boston, USA.

Published: January 2022

AI Article Synopsis

  • Studies show that colorectal cancer patients have better survival rates when surgeries are done at high-volume hospitals.
  • This study analyzed data from over 52,000 patients who underwent proctectomy for rectal cancer to compare survival based on the treating facility's volume.
  • Results indicated that higher facility volumes correlated with improved one-year and five-year survival rates, suggesting that surgery at more experienced centers can lead to better outcomes, though the differences may not be as significant as earlier studies claimed.

Article Abstract

Background: Prior studies assessing colorectal cancer survival have reported better outcomes when operations are performed at high-volume centers. These studies have largely been cross-sectional, making it difficult to interpret their estimates. We aimed to assess the effect of facility volume on survival following proctectomy for rectal cancer.

Methods: Using data from the National Cancer Database, we included all patients with complete baseline information who underwent proctectomy for non-metastatic rectal cancer between 2004 and 2016. Facility volume was defined as the number of rectal cancer cases managed at the treating center in the calendar year prior to the patient's surgery. Overall survival estimates were obtained for facility volumes ranging from 10 to 100 cases/year. Follow-up began on the day of surgery and continued until loss to follow-up or death.

Results: A total of 52,822 patients were eligible. Patients operated on at hospitals with volumes of 10, 30, and 50 cases/year had similar distributions of grade, clinical stage, and neoadjuvant therapies. 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival all improved with increasing facility volume. One-year survival was 94.0% (95% CI: 93.7, 94.3) for hospitals that performed 10 cases/year, 94.5% (95% CI: 94.2, 94.7) for 30 cases/year, and 94.8% (95% CI: 94.5, 95.0) for 50 cases/year. Five-year survival was 68.9% (95% CI: 68.0, 69.7) for hospitals that performed 10 cases/year, 70.8% (95% CI: 70.1, 71.5) for 30 cases/year, and 72.0% (95% CI: 71.2, 72.8) for 50 cases/year.

Conclusions: Treatment at a higher volume facility results in improved survival following proctectomy for rectal cancer, though the small benefits are less profound than previously reported.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-05092-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

facility volume
16
rectal cancer
16
survival proctectomy
12
proctectomy rectal
12
survival
8
volume survival
8
hospitals performed
8
performed cases/year
8
cases/year
7
facility
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!