Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The aim of this study is to compare bacterial leakage of MicroHeat and continuous wave with and without endodontic sealer. Thirty-eight single-rooted extracted mandibular premolars were selected and randomly divided into four experimental groups (n=8) and two control groups (n=3). Teeth were prepared with Mtwo NiTi files and obturated with MicroHeat or System B with or without endodontic sealer. Three teeth were used as positive controls (Ct+) and three intact teeth served as negative controls (Ct-). All samples were tested for bacterial infiltration every day for 60 days. On day 32 overall contamination value was 62.5% for Mseal, 75% for Mnoseal, 75% for SBseal and 37.8% for SBnoseal; after 60 days, the final contamination result was 100% for Mseal, Mnoseal and SBseal and 87.5% for SBnoseal. At the end of the observation period, groups showed no statistically significant differences.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.23812/21-3supp1-9 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!