AI Article Synopsis

  • Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) is used to measure arterial stiffness, and this study compares two devices—a tonometry-based one (SphygmoCor XCEL) and a brachial-cuff-based one (Mobil-O-Graph)—in South African women and children.
  • The study involved 85 women and 27 children, and results showed that the SphygmoCor XCEL reported significantly higher PWV values than Mobil-O-Graph in adults, though both devices had acceptable agreement.
  • In children, the agreement between the devices was excellent, but no correlation was found; the research highlights that Mobil-O-Graph may underestimate PWV in younger and taller women, suggesting a need

Article Abstract

Background: Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) is the gold-standard noninvasive measure of arterial stiffness. Data comparing tonometry-based devices such as the SphygmoCor XCEL to simpler brachial-cuff-based estimates of PWV, such as from the Mobil-O-Graph in African populations are sparse. We therefore aimed to compare PWV measured by the Mobil-O-Graph and the SphygmoCor XCEL device in a sample of South African women and children.

Methods: Women (n = 85) 29 years [interquartile range (IQR): 29-69] and their children/grandchildren (n = 27) 7 years (IQR: 4-11) were recruited for PWV measurement with Mobil-O-Graph and SphygmoCor XCEL on the same day. Wilcoxon signed-rank test, regression analysis, spearman correlation and Bland-Altman plots were used for PWV comparison between devices.

Results: For adults, the SphygmoCor XCEL device had a significantly higher PWV (7.3 m/s, IQR: 6.4-8.5) compared with the Mobil-O-Graph (5.9 m/s, IQR: 5.0-8.1, P = 0.001) with a correlation coefficient of 0.809 (P ≤ 0.001). Bland--Altman analysis indicated an acceptable level of agreement but significant bias (mean difference PWV: 0.90 ± 1.02 m/s; limits of agreement: -1.10 to 2.90). The odds of having a PWV difference more than 1 m/s decreased with a higher age [odds ratio (OR): 0.95, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.92-0.98] and increased with greater height (OR: 1.10, 95% CI = 1.01-1.21, P = 0.03) in multivariable analysis. In children, the Bland-Altman indicated an excellent level of agreement (-0.03 ± 0.63 m/s; limits of agreement: -1.26 to 1.21), but no correlation was found (rs = 0.08, P = 0.71).

Conclusion: Particularly in younger and taller women, the Mobil-O-Graph significantly underestimated PWV compared with the SphygmoCor. Although no correlation was found between the two devices for children, further research is required due to the small sample size. Furthermore, the clinical value of both methods in young African populations requires further investigation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8654263PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0000000000002976DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sphygmocor xcel
20
mobil-o-graph sphygmocor
12
pwv
9
pulse wave
8
wave velocity
8
south african
8
african women
8
african populations
8
xcel device
8
level agreement
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!