People living with medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) often have poor quality of life and health outcomes. Many struggle to engage with and trust in healthcare systems. This qualitative study examined how experiences with institutions influence perceptions of medical care for MUS by applying the theoretical framework of institutional betrayal to narratives of U.S. military Veterans living with Gulf War Illness (GWI). Institutional betrayal refers to situations in which the institutions people depend upon for safety and well-being cause them harm. Experiences of institutional betrayal both during active military service and when first seeking treatment appeared to shape perceptions of healthcare in this sample. Veterans expressed the belief that the military failed to protect them from environmental exposures. Veterans' concerns regarding subsequent quality of healthcare were intrinsically linked to a belief that, despite official documentation to the contrary, the predominant paradigm of both the U.S. Department of Defense and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is that GWI does not exist. Veterans reported that providers are not adequately trained on treatment of GWI and do not believe Veterans' descriptions of their illness. Veterans reported taking up self-advocacy, doing their own research on their condition, and resigning themselves to decrease engagement with VA healthcare or seek non-VA care. The study's findings suggest institutional level factors have a profound impact on perceptions of care and the patient-provider relationship. Future research and policy aimed at improving healthcare for people living with MUS should consider the concept of institutional betrayal.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114211 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Cultivating the conditions for care: it's all about trust.
Front Health Serv
December 2024
University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
This perspective article shares the viewpoints of two long-standing patient safety advocates who have participated first-hand in the evolution of patient engagement in healthcare quality and safety. Their involvement is motivated by a rejection of the common cruelty of institutional betrayal that compounds harm when patient safety fails. The advocates have sought to understand how it can be that fractured trust spreads so predictably after harm, just when it most needs strengthening.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInstitutional Betrayal in Military and Veteran Populations: A Systematic Scoping Review.
J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc
December 2024
Kelly K. McCarron, PsyD, Veterans Affairs New Jersey Health Care System, East Orange, NJ, USA.
Institutional betrayal (IB) refers to the wrongdoings, encompassing both action and inaction, committed by institutions against their affiliated individuals. Military members are particularly vulnerable to IB due to strong social identification with the military, values of loyalty and self-sacrifice, dependence on the institution, the military power structure and legal system, and the complexity of morality in an occupation centered around war. This review examines the state of IB literature within the military/Veteran population, identifying research gaps and implications for future policy and clinical care.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInfluence of Betrayal on Emotional Modulation of Executive Control: Evidence From ERPs.
Hum Brain Mapp
December 2024
School of Education Science, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Previous studies have found that betrayal increases negative attentional bias and hinders executive control. However, it remains unclear how betrayal influences emotional modulation of executive control. What's more, according to the dual mechanisms of control model, executive control can be divided into reactive and proactive control.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFInstitutional courage attenuates the association between institutional betrayal and trauma symptoms among campus sexual assault survivors.
Psychol Trauma
December 2024
Department of Psychology, University of Oregon.
Article Synopsis
- The study investigates the impact of institutional betrayal on trauma symptoms among campus sexual assault survivors, highlighting how ineffective institutional responses can worsen a survivor's distress.
- It examines the concept of institutional courage, which refers to supportive and transparent actions by institutions, and how it relates to the mental health outcomes of survivors.
- Findings suggest that while institutional betrayal typically increases trauma symptoms, high levels of institutional courage can mitigate this negative effect, indicating that fostering institutional courage can be beneficial for survivors.
Associations between defensive victim-blaming responses (DARVO), rape myth acceptance, and sexual harassment.
PLoS One
December 2024
Center for Institutional Courage, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
DARVO (Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender) is a response frequently exhibited by perpetrators of wrongdoing after being confronted or held accountable for their harmful behaviors. Consistent with the original conceptualization of DARVO as a strategy used by sex offenders to deflect blame and responsibility, sexual violence survivors report experiencing DARVO from their perpetrators following an assault. The purpose of the current study was to extend research on the connections between DARVO and sexual violence.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!