A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

In Silico Evolution of High-Performing Metal Organic Frameworks for Methane Adsorption. | LitMetric

In Silico Evolution of High-Performing Metal Organic Frameworks for Methane Adsorption.

J Chem Inf Model

Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Connecticut, 191 Auditorium Rd. Unit 3222, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, United States.

Published: July 2021

The increased use of transition fuels, such as natural gas, and the resulting increase in methane emissions have resulted in a need for novel methane storage materials. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have shown promise as efficient storage materials. A virtually limitless number of potential MOFs can be hypothesized, which exhibit a wide variety of different structural and chemical characteristics. Because of the numerous possibilities, identification of the best MOF for methane storage can be a potentially challenging problem. In this work, determination of the best such MOF was cast as an inverse function problem. The function, a random forest (RF) model using 12 structural and chemical descriptors, was trained on 10% of a data set consisting of 130 398 hypothetical MOFs (hMOFs) to predict simulated methane uptake. The RF model was tested on the remaining 90% of the data. After validation, a genetic algorithm (GA) was used to evolve in silico the best MOFs for methane adsorption. The RF model was imbedded into the GA as the fitness function to predict the methane uptake of the evolved MOFs (eMOFs). The best 15 eMOFs matched hMOFs found in the top 1% of the database. Nine of the 15 eMOFs were found in the top 0.1%. More impressively, two of the eMOFs matched the top two hypothetical MOFs with the highest methane uptake values out of the entire database of 130 398 MOFs. Further, by leveraging the ensemble nature of the GA, it was possible to characterize the importance of the different material properties for methane adsorption, providing fundamental insight for future material design strategies.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01479DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

methane adsorption
12
methane uptake
12
methane
9
methane storage
8
storage materials
8
structural chemical
8
best mof
8
hypothetical mofs
8
emofs matched
8
mofs
7

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!