SEM Evaluation of Various Intracanal Irrigation Devices on Smear Layer Removal: A Comparative Study.

J Contemp Dent Pract

Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Majmaah University, Az-Zulfi, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Published: February 2021

AI Article Synopsis

  • Aim: The study evaluated how effective different irrigation devices are in removing the smear layer from root canals.
  • Materials & Methods: Eighty lower premolars were used, with manual instrumentation and irrigation applied through four different systems: conventional needle, ultrasonic activation, EndoVac system, and EndoActivator, followed by examination under a scanning electron microscope (SEM).
  • Results & Conclusion: The EndoVac system was the most effective in removing the smear layer, followed by EndoActivator, ultrasonic activation, and conventional needle irrigation. Statistically significant differences were found between these groups.

Article Abstract

Aim: The present study aimed at assessing the effectiveness of different intracanal irrigation devices on the removal of the smear layer.

Materials And Methods: The recently extracted 80 lower premolars having single canal were chosen for this study. A round diamond bur was used to gain endodontic access and the root canal was entered with a #15 K-file until the tip was just seen at the apical foramen. Manual instrumentation of root canals of all teeth was done using the step-back method. The samples were later divided randomly into four groups. Later, each sample was exposed to final irrigation by using four different irrigation systems, group 1: conventional needle irrigation, group 2: irrigation with ultrasonic activation, group 3: irrigation with EndoVac system activation, group 4: irrigation with EndoActivator. The samples were next mounted and visualized under scanning electron microscope (SEM) for the absence or presence of the smear layer.

Results: Irrigation with EndoVac system activation showed the presence of least smear layer (2.40 ± 0.32), followed next by EndoActivator (3.24 ± 0.46) and ultrasonic activation (4.96 ± 0.54) and conventional needle irrigation (5.20 ± 0.10). No statistically significant difference was found in the apical and coronal thirds of the root canal in removal of the smear layer on an intragroup comparison. However, a statistically significant ( < 0.001) difference was seen between the groups at the apical and coronal thirds on an intergroup comparison.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated the EndoVac system group to be efficient in removal of the smear layer when compared to the EndoActivator system, ultrasonic activation, and conventional needle irrigation group.

Clinical Significance: The definitive objective of endodontic therapy is to transform the affected teeth to a healthy and functional state. The irrigants can reach the working length when delivered by an effective irrigation delivery system. This type of delivery system should deliver adequate volume of irrigants all the way up to the working length and have sufficient flow and be efficient at debridement of complete canal system.

Download full-text PDF

Source

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

smear layer
16
irrigation
12
removal smear
12
conventional needle
12
needle irrigation
12
group irrigation
12
ultrasonic activation
12
endovac system
12
intracanal irrigation
8
irrigation devices
8

Similar Publications

Objectives: To evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of universal cements (UCs) to dentin prepared with different diamond burs using various adhesive strategies.

Materials And Methods: One-hundred-twenty molars were prepared to expose the mid-coronal dentin. The teeth were divided into two groups according to diamond bur preparations: coarse and super-fine grit burs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives:  The aim of this study was to determine the effect of apical preparation size and preparation taper on smear layer removal using a metallic needle and a new polymer needle (IrriFlex, Produits Dentaires SA "PD," Vevey, Switzerland).

Materials And Methods:  One hundred and eight single-rooted teeth with one canal were randomly divided into four groups according to the preparation and irrigation needle used: G1-30, 0.04 and IrriFlex ( = 25); G2-25, 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of multi-functional root canal irrigating solutions in the removal of canal wall smear layers, antibacterial activity, cytotoxicity, and tissue dissolution efficacy.

Methods: Forty single-rooted teeth were mechanically instrumented and irrigated with Triton, EndoJuice™, EDTA, and 0.9% saline.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: This study evaluated the smear layer removal provided by conventional, sonic, and ultrasonic irrigation techniques.

Methodology: Forty extracted human mandibular first premolars were selected and instrumented using the ProTaper Next System files and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: All commercial chelating gels contain EDTA which reacts chemically with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). This research aimed to develop a non-EDTA clodronate gel and to measure physicochemical and functional gel properties of the novel and commercial gels.

Methodology: A 1.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!