Objectives: This study aimed to compare the estimation error of physical activity level (PAL) estimated using a tri-axial accelerometer between an independent walking group and an assisted walking group with walking aids.

Methods: Subjects were 6 older adults who could walk independently and 10 older adults requiring walking assistance during gait. Total energy expenditure (TEE) was measured using the doubly labelled water (DLW) method over 2 weeks and PAL was calculated as the measured TEE divided by the basal metabolic rate measured using indirect calorimetry (PAL). The participants wore a tri-axial accelerometer (Active style Pro HJA-750C) on the waist simultaneously as the DLW period, and the estimated PAL was derived from it (PAL).

Results: The median PAL estimation error in the assisted walking group was -0.30 kcal/day (range: -0.77 to -0.01 kcal/day) and more underestimated than that in the independent walking group (p=0.02). The estimation error of PAL was significantly correlated with PAL (r=-0.80, p<0.01).

Conclusions: Using the accelerometer, PAL was underestimated for older adults who used walking aids but not for those who walked independently under free-living conditions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8237722PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2020-001014DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

walking group
16
tri-axial accelerometer
12
older adults
12
estimation error
12
physical activity
8
independent walking
8
assisted walking
8
pal
7
walking
6
impact walking
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!