AI Article Synopsis

  • * A total of 68 patients were examined, with 46 receiving intravenous steroids and 22 receiving intratympanic therapy; outcomes were similarly effective with around 43% and 52% of patients completely cured, respectively.
  • * While intravenous treatment had side effects like increased blood pressure and insomnia, intratympanic treatment was mostly side effect-free aside from one instance of tympanic membrane perforation, suggesting both treatments are comparably safe.

Article Abstract

Objective: Systemic administration of glucocorticoid steroids is the most common initial treatment for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL); however, due to the prevalence of coronavirus disease, the indications for this treatment must be carefully determined. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of intratympanic steroid therapy as an initial treatment for idiopathic SSNHL.

Methods: Sixty-eight patients with idiopathic ISSNHL who were treated with intravenous or intratympanic steroids were included in this study. Patients were retrospectively evaluated regarding preoperative grade, type of additional treatment, outcome of treatment, and side effects of each treatment.

Results: In 46 cases, patients received intravenous steroid therapy as the initial treatment, while 22 patients received intratympanic steroid therapy; 10 patients underwent salvage treatment due to inadequate improvement of symptoms. Regarding additional treatment, intravenous steroid monotherapy was used in 37 patients. The outcomes were similar after both treatments; 16 (43%) and 11 (52%) patients treated exclusively with intravenous and intratympanic steroids, respectively, were completely cured. There were no significant differences in the effects between the 2 treatments, indicating that they were almost equally effective. The side effects observed in patients treated with intravenous steroid therapy were increased blood pressure, acute gastric mucosal disorder, and insomnia. None of these side effects were observed in any of the patients treated with intratympanic steroids; however, 1 case of perforation of the tympanic membrane occurred due to the procedure.

Conclusion: There were no significant differences in posttreatment outcomes between patients treated with either intratympanic or intravenous steroids. The therapeutic effects were comparable, and no severe side effects were observed; therefore, intratympanic steroid therapy may be considered useful as an initial treatment for ISSNHL in the context of widespread coronavirus disease.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/01455613211032534DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

initial treatment
20
steroid therapy
20
side effects
16
patients treated
16
therapy initial
12
treatment idiopathic
12
intratympanic steroid
12
intratympanic steroids
12
intravenous steroid
12
effects observed
12

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!