A retrospective cross-sectional study of early patient-reported failures of direct restorations placed in a primary dental care setting.

Introduction A retrospective cross-sectional study of early patient-reported failures of restorations was initiated to understand the reasons and factors associated with early failure. Early patient-reported failures are defined as restorations requiring replacement within three months of placement.Aim To investigate if restorative material placed or any other tooth/restoration/patient factors may be associated with early patient-reported failures.Methods In total, 360 restorations were replaced from January 2016 to December 2017. Multivariable analyses (logistic regression model) were used to identify any patient/tooth/restoration factors that were associated with early patient-reported failures.Results Dislodgement, fracture and pain/sensitivity were the three main failure modes. There was significant association between restorative material type and dislodgement and restoration fracture. The odds of dislodgement for composite resin (CR) were 4.3 times higher compared to amalgam. The odds of dislodgement for glass-ionomer cement (GIC) and resin-modified GIC were 3.7 times higher compared to amalgam. The odds of fracture for CR were ten times lower compared to amalgam. The odds of pain for teeth with a history of restoration failure for a particular tooth were five times lower compared to no history of restoration failure for a particular tooth.Conclusions Restorative material type affected patient-reported failures.