Objective: This study investigated patient outcomes of care before and after transitioning to a surgical intensivist-led trauma-intensive care unit (ICU) team. The intensivist team provided daily multidisciplinary rounds and continuity of care. Prior to an intensivist model, general surgeons cared for trauma patients admitted to the unit.

Methods: Outcomes of 1,078 trauma patients, admitted to the ICU at a Level II trauma center, under care of general surgeons (1/2011-8/2012, n = 449) were retrospectively compared with care managed by a surgical intensivist team (1/2013-5/2015, n = 629) by Pearson Chi-squared and Wilcoxon tests. A multivariable logistic regression technique was used to control for covariates. Demographics and injury severity were analyzed. The primary outcome was ICU mortality. The secondary outcomes were length of stay (LOS), ventilator-free and ICU-free days, and ICU readmission rate. Other data collected included palliative care consultation. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in ICU mortality (P = 0.055), hospital LOS (P = 0.481), ventilator-free days (P = 0.174), or ICU readmission rate (P = 0.587). The surgical intensivist team consulted palliative care more frequently (4.0% vs 13.5%, P < 0.001), while managing more trauma patients who were older than 65 years (P < 0.001) with lower Glasgow Coma Scale (P = 0.048) and higher injury severity (P = 0.025) and abbreviated injury scale (P < 0.001) scores.

Discussion: There were no differences in outcomes. However, incorporating palliative care consultation in the ICU is essential in the support of critically ill patients and their families. These data demonstrate that a surgical intensivist team utilized palliative care more often in the management of trauma patients admitted to the ICU.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10499091211025733DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

palliative care
20
surgical intensivist
16
intensivist team
16
trauma patients
16
care consultation
12
patients admitted
12
care
11
icu
9
intensivist model
8
general surgeons
8

Similar Publications

Introduction: Intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment (IIPT) is the best therapy available for children and adolescents affected by severe chronic pain. Psychosocial aftercare (PAC) offered for 6 months after IIPT can improve treatment outcomes for up to 12 months.

Objectives: The current study is the first to explore whether PAC is superior to treatment as usual at a long-term follow-up of 18 to 33 months after discharge-including when facing the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Patients with chronic nonmalignant pulmonary disease and lung cancer both need palliative care, but palliative care services may be better adjusted to serve cancer patients. We compared the timing and clinical practice of palliative care and acute hospital usage during the last year of life in patients with nonmalignant pulmonary disease or lung cancer.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of all patients in a palliative care phase (palliative goal of care) with nonmalignant pulmonary disease or lung cancer who were treated at Tampere University Hospital, Finland, during the years 2018-2020.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Measuring palliative care quality requires the application of evaluation methods to compare clinically meaningful groups of patients across different settings. Such protocols are currently lacking in Poland. The Australian Palliative Care Outcome Collaboration (PCOC) concept of Palliative phases precisely defines patients, enables episodes of care extraction for benchmarking and further assessment of service delivery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: COVID-19 drastically affected healthcare services world-wide. In the UK, many cancer services were overwhelmed as oncology staff were reassigned, and cancer diagnoses and treatments were delayed. The impact of these pressures on end-of-life care for patients with advanced cancer and their relatives is not well understood.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: This study aimed to explore the social factors of patients and caregivers, including those related to their wishes for home-based end-of-life care that influence its fulfillment.

Methods: A secondary analysis was conducted using the dataset (home-based end-of-life care N = 625, hospital end-of-life care N = 7603) Comprehensive patient-based survey conducted by The Study on Quality Evaluation of Hospice and Palliative Care by Bereaved Caregivers (J-HOPE 4) and multivariate analysis (multiple logistic regression) to explore the impact of social factors of patients and caregivers on the fulfillment of home-based end-of-life care. The explanatory variables included 11 social factors of patients, such as age and sex, and 18 social factors of primary caregivers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!