We examined the impact of COVID-19 on bullying prevalence rates in a sample of 6578 Canadian students in Grades 4 to 12. To account for school changes associated with the pandemic, students were randomized at the school level into two conditions: (1) the pre-COVID-19 condition, assessing bullying prevalence rates retrospectively before the pandemic, and (2) the current condition, assessing rates during the pandemic. Results indicated that students reported far higher rates of bullying involvement before the pandemic than during the pandemic across all forms of bullying (general, physical, verbal, and social), except for cyber bullying, where differences in rates were less pronounced. Despite anti-Asian rhetoric during the pandemic, no difference was found between East Asian Canadian and White students on bullying victimization. Finally, our validity checks largely confirmed previous published patterns in both conditions: (1) girls were more likely to report being bullied than boys, (2) boys were more likely to report bullying others than girls, (3) elementary school students reported higher bullying involvement than secondary school students, and (4) gender diverse and LGTBQ + students reported being bullied at higher rates than students who identified as gender binary or heterosexual. These results highlight that the pandemic may have mitigated bullying rates, prompting the need to consider retaining some of the educational reforms used to reduce the spread of the virus that could foster caring interpersonal relationships at school such as reduced class sizes, increased supervision, and blended learning.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ab.21986DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bullying
9
bullying prevalence
8
prevalence rates
8
condition assessing
8
students reported
8
reported higher
8
higher rates
8
bullying involvement
8
school students
8
rates
7

Similar Publications

Background: This cross-sectional study investigated gender differences in barriers to career development among dental researchers and between academic and non-academic women.

Methods: An anonymous 34-item survey assessing barriers to career development and workplace obstacles (14 items), along with demographic/occupation characteristics (22 items), was distributed among dental researchers at the Women In Science Network meetings at 2024 AADOCR/IADR General Session (QR code) and through AADOCR/IADR discussion board (online platform). Differences in barriers and workplace obstacles were analyzed between women and men with chi-square tests; comparisons were repeated among women working within versus outside academia.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In this conceptual article, the authors provide a narrative review of literature on bullying and sexual harassment in K-12 schools framed through a comparative analysis of risk and protective factors for both forms of violence across the social-ecological spectrum. We find that a greater number of studies of both forms of violence focus on student and microsystem-level factors rather than on higher levels of the ecosystem including school boards, neighborhoods, and broader cultural norms. In addition, the research overwhelmingly identifies more risk factors than protective factors.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Memorializes Arthur (Andy) M. Horne (1942-2024), esteemed counseling psychologist, lauded for his contributions to group counseling, bullying prevention, violence reduction, and prevention. Andy served the University of Georgia in the Department of Counseling and Human Development Services from 1989 to 2012 as training director, department chair, distinguished research professor, and dean (2008-2012).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Bullying Behaviors in Clinical Settings: Potentially Harmful Distractions.

Nurs Educ Perspect

January 2025

About the Authors Dawna Rutherford, PhD, RN, adjunct clinical instructor, Salem State University, Salem, Massachusetts, is with Staff Nurse/Traveler RN Network, Nome, Alaska. Gordon Lee Gillespie, PhD, DNP, RN, was professor, College of Nursing, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, when this study was conducted. He is currently chief program officer, National League for Nursing. Scott Bresler, PhD, was clinical director, Division of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, when this study was conducted. Kimberly Johnson, PhD, RN, CEN, and Carolyn R. Smith, PhD, RN, CNE, are associate professors, College of Nursing, University of Cincinnati. This study was funded by an award to Dr. Rutherford from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health through the Pilot Research Project Training Program of the University of Cincinnati Education and Research Center Grant #T42OH008432. For more information, contact Dr. Gillespie at

Nursing students exposed to bullying behaviors are at risk for making medication errors. For a quasi-experimental study, 15 prelicensure nursing students at a Midwestern university were exposed to simulated bullying behaviors or common distractions while administering medications in a laboratory setting. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis tests.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!