Reliability of Handheld Dynamometry to Measure Focal Muscle Weakness in Neurofibromatosis Types 1 and 2.

Neurology

From New York University (NYU) School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health (S.A., N.K., K.Y., J.A., A.Y., M.P., C.E., J.O., C.M.), New York; Pediatric Oncology Branch (S.A., A.M.G., B.C.W.), Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD; Massachusetts General Hospital (A.M.), Boston; Division of Oncology (M.J.F.), The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA; Department of Neurology (J.O.B.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Neurofibromatosis Network (B.O.); Department of Pediatrics (D.A.S.), Division of Medical Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA; and Cancer Center and Department of Neurology (S.R.P.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.

Published: August 2021

Objective: To determine a suitable outcome measure for assessing muscle strength in neurofibromatosis (NF) type 1 and NF2 clinical trials, we evaluated the intraobserver reliability of handheld dynamometry (HHD) and developed consensus recommendations for its use in NF clinical trials.

Methods: Patients ≥5 years of age with weakness in at least 1 muscle group by manual muscle testing (MMT) were eligible. Maximal isometric muscle strength of a weak muscle group and the biceps of the dominant arm was measured by HHD. An average of 3 repetitions per session was used as an observation, and 3 sessions with rest period between each were performed on the same day by a single observer. Intrasession and intersession intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and coefficients of variation (CVs) were calculated to assess reliability and measurement error.

Results: Twenty patients with NF1 and 13 with NF2 were enrolled; median age was 12 years (interquartile range [IQR] 9-17 years) and 29 years (IQR 22-38 years), respectively. By MMT, weak muscle strength ranged from 2-/5 to 4+/5. Biceps strength was 5/5 in all patients. Intersession ICCs for the weak muscles were 0.98 and 0.99 in the NF1 and NF2 cohorts, respectively, and for biceps were 0.97 and 0.97, respectively. The median CVs for average session strength were 5.4% (IQR 2.6%-7.3%) and 2.9% (IQR 2.0%-6.2%) for weak muscles and biceps, respectively.

Conclusion: HHD performed by a trained examiner with a well-defined protocol is a reliable technique to measure muscle strength in NF1 and NF2. Recommendations for strength testing in NF1 and NF2 trials are provided.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8593999PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000012439DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

muscle strength
16
nf1 nf2
16
reliability handheld
8
handheld dynamometry
8
muscle
8
muscle group
8
weak muscle
8
weak muscles
8
strength
7
nf2
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!