Safety practices for in-office laryngology procedures during clinical reintroduction amidst COVID-19.

Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol

The Indiana University School of Medicine and the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Indiana University Indianapolis Indiana USA.

Published: August 2021

Objective: Describe safety practices for performing in-office laryngology procedures during clinical re-introduction amidst the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Methods: An anonymous survey in Qualtrics was created to evaluate demographics, preprocedure testing, practice settings, anesthesia, and personal protective equipment (PPE) use for five procedure categories (non-mucosal-traversing injections, mucosal-traversing injections, endoscopy without suction, endoscopy with suction/mucosal intervention via working channel, and laser via working channel). The survey was emailed to the Fall Voice Community on Doc Matter and to members of the American Broncho-Esophagological Association (ABEA) from May to June 2020.

Results: Eighty-two respondents were analyzed (response rate: 10%). Respondents represented diverse locations, including international. Most reported academic (71%) or private practices (16%), laryngology fellowship training (76%), and a significant practice devotion to laryngology and broncho-esophagology. During the early re-introduction, most continued to perform all procedure categories. The office was preferred to the OR setting for most, though 36% preferred the OR for laser procedures. There was a preference for preprocedural SARS-Cov2 testing for procedures involving a working channel (>67%), and these procedures had the highest proportion of respondents discontinuing the procedure due to COVID-19. Various types of topical anesthesia were reported, including nebulizer treatments. The most common forms of personal protective equipment utilized were gloves (>95%) and N95 masks (>67%). Powered-air purifying respirators and general surgical masks were used infrequently.

Conclusions: During the early re-introduction, respondents reported generally continuing to perform office laryngology procedures, while greater mucosal manipulation affected decisions to stop procedures due to COVID-19, perform preprocedural SARS-Cov2 testing, and alter topical anesthesia. Gloves and N95 masks were the predominate PPE.

Level Of Evidence: N/A.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8242633PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.591DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

laryngology procedures
12
working channel
12
safety practices
8
in-office laryngology
8
procedures clinical
8
personal protective
8
protective equipment
8
procedure categories
8
early re-introduction
8
preprocedural sars-cov2
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!