Forensic genetic identification of sharks involved in human attacks.

Forensic Sci Int Genet

UMR ENTROPIE (Université de La Réunion, IRD, IFREMER, Université de Nouvelle-Calédonie, CNRS), Université de La Réunion, Saint-Denis, La Réunion, France; Laboratoire Cogitamus, Paris, France; Laboratoire d'Excellence CORAIL, Perpignan, France.

Published: September 2021

Each year, 75-100 unprovoked shark attacks on humans are recorded, most of them resulting in no or minor injuries, while a few are fatal. Often, shark identification responsible for attacks relies on visual observations or bite wound characteristics, which limits species determination and preclude individual identification. Here, we provide two genetic approaches to reliably identify species and/or individuals involved in shark attacks on humans based on a non-invasive DNA sampling (i.e. DNA traces present on bite wounds on victims), depending on the knowledge of previous attack history at the site. The first approach uses barcoding techniques allowing species identification without any a priori, while the second relies on microsatellite genotyping, allowing species identification confirmation and individual identification, but requiring an a priori of the potential species involved in the attack. Both approaches were validated by investigating two shark attacks that occurred in Reunion Island (southwestern Indian Ocean). According to both methods, each incident was attributed to a bull shark (Carcharhinus leucas), in agreement with suggestions derived from bite wound characteristics. Both approaches appear thus suitable for the reliable identification of species involved in shark attacks on humans. Moreover, microsatellite genotyping reveals, in the studied cases, that two distinct individuals were responsible of the bites. Applying these genetic identification methods will resolve ambiguities on shark species involved in attacks and allow the collection of individual data to better understand and mitigate shark risk.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102558DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

shark attacks
16
attacks humans
12
species involved
12
identification
8
genetic identification
8
shark
8
bite wound
8
wound characteristics
8
individual identification
8
involved shark
8

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • * Stranding incidents peaked in 2011 and 2018, primarily occurring from March to August; the main identified cause of stranding was fishing gear, while over half had unknown causes.
  • * The study provides crucial insights into the stranding patterns on Hawaii Island, revealing regional differences in health issues and threats, which can help inform conservation strategies and policies for green turtles.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Counterillumination reduces bites by Great White sharks.

Curr Biol

December 2024

School of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia. Electronic address:

In the open ocean, achieving camouflage is complicated by the fact that the downwelling light is generally much brighter than the upwelling light, which means that any object, even if its ventral surface is white due to countershading, will appear as a dark silhouette when viewed from below. To overcome this, many marine species employ counterillumination, whereby light is emitted from photophores on their ventral surface to replace the downwelling light blocked by their body. However, only a single behavioral study has tested the efficacy of counterillumination as an anti-predation strategy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Recent developments indicate that malware programs present a significant risk in the security and privacy of cloud systems. Existing research in malware detection encounters numerous significant challenges due to the constantly changing and advanced characteristics of malware. Malware detection systems frequently experience high rates of false positives and false negatives, where legitimate applications are incorrectly identified as malware or actual malware remains undetected, which results in operational inefficiencies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Research on interactions between sharks and cetaceans is limited, but a new video shows a shortfin mako shark circling a finless porpoise with a damaged tail.
  • The porpoise appeared healthy but couldn't swim properly due to the injury, and evidence like a bite mark indicates it may have been attacked by the shark.
  • This observation suggests that mako sharks might hunt live cetaceans more frequently than previously believed, despite mostly feeding on small fish and cephalopods.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Who bit the boat? New DNA collection and genomic methods enable species identification in suspected shark-related incidents.

Forensic Sci Int Genet

September 2024

Flinders University, College of Science and Engineering, Bedford Park, SA 5042,  Australia; Flinders University, Southern Shark Ecology Group, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia; The Georgia Aquarium, Atlanta, GA 30313, United States. Electronic address:

Species identification following shark-related incidents is critical for effective incident management and for collecting data to inform shark-bite mitigation strategies. Witness statements are not always reliable, and species identification is often ambiguous or missing. Alternative methods for species identification include morphological assessments of bite marks, analysis of collected teeth at the scene of the incident, and genetic approaches.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!