Misinformation and promotion of well-intended but disproved therapies for COVID-19 have plagued evidence-based shared decision-making throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. In times of crisis, clinicians may feel that their strong inclination to prescribe potentially harmful, unproven therapies on behalf of their patients is supported by beneficence. Clinicians should mindfully identify and avoid commission bias during this pandemic, especially as more data have accumulated to assist with clinically sound decision-making. We describe a more evidence-based approach to treatment of early outpatient COVID-19, stressing the availability of Food and Drug Administration emergency use authorization therapies and considering plausibly beneficial, nonprescription supplements that are generally regarded as safe.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8182819PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2021.1925049DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

evidence-based approach
8
early outpatient
8
approach early
4
outpatient treatment
4
treatment sars-cov-2
4
covid-19
4
sars-cov-2 covid-19
4
covid-19 infection
4
infection misinformation
4
misinformation promotion
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!