Wisdom of crowds detects COVID-19 severity ahead of officially available data.

Sci Rep

Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.

Published: July 2021

During the unfolding of a crisis, it is crucial to forecast its severity at an early stage , yet access to reliable data is often challenging early on. The wisdom of crowds has been effective at forecasting in similar scenarios. We investigated whether the initial regional social media reaction to the emerging COVID-19 pandemic in three critically affected countries has significant relations with their observed mortality a month later. We obtained COVID-19 related regionally geolocated tweets from Italian, Spanish, and United States regions. We quantified the predictive power of the wisdom of the crowds using correlations and regressions of geolocated Tweet Intensity (TI) during the initial social media attention peak versus the cumulative number of deaths a month ahead. We found that the intensity of initial COVID-19 related tweet attention at the beginning of the pandemic across Italian, Spanish, and United States regions is significantly related (p < 0.001) to the extent to which these regions had been affected by the pandemic a month later. This association is most striking in Italy as when at its peak of TI in late February 2020 only two of its regions had reported mortality. The collective wisdom of the crowds at early stages of the pandemic, when information on the number of infections was not broadly available, strikingly predicted the extent of mortality reflecting the regional severity of the pandemic almost a month later. Our findings could underpin the creation of real-time novelty detection systems aimed at early reporting of the severity of crises impacting a territory leading to early activation of control measures at a stage when available data is extremely limited.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8249482PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93042-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

wisdom crowds
12
social media
8
italian spanish
8
spanish united
8
united states
8
states regions
8
intensity initial
8
crowds detects
4
covid-19
4
detects covid-19
4

Similar Publications

Sequential collaboration describes the incremental process of contributing to online collaborative projects such as Wikipedia and OpenStreetMap. After a first contributor creates an initial entry, subsequent contributors create a sequential chain by deciding whether to adjust or maintain the latest entry which is updated if they decide to make changes. Sequential collaboration has recently been examined as a method for eliciting numerical group judgments.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Embracing local knowledge is crucial for biodiversity conservation, but there is a lack of effective frameworks to incorporate this knowledge properly.
  • Using a Wisdom of Crowds approach, the study tested whether diverse groups of individuals, with varying ages and fishing experience, provided better estimates of fishing quality compared to more uniform groups.
  • The research found that targeting a diverse group of 31% of survey participants captured most unique responses; small diverse groups were as effective as larger ones in assessing ecological conditions, highlighting the importance of including varied knowledge holders in research.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

For unfamiliar faces, deciding whether two photographs depict the same person or not can be difficult. One way to substantially improve accuracy is to defer to the 'wisdom of crowds' by aggregating responses across multiple individuals. However, there are several methods available for doing this.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

How wise is the crowd: Can we infer people are accurate and competent merely because they agree with each other?

Cognition

February 2025

Institut Jean Nicod, Département d'études cognitives, ENS, EHESS, PSL University, CNRS, France. Electronic address:

Are people who agree on something more likely to be right and competent? Evidence suggests that people tend to make this inference. However, standard wisdom of crowds approaches only provide limited normative grounds. Using simulations and analytical arguments, we argue that when individuals make independent and unbiased estimates, under a wide range of parameters, individuals whose answers converge with each other tend to have more accurate answers and to be more competent.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Human forecasting accuracy improves through the "wisdom of the crowd" effect, in which aggregated predictions tend to outperform individual ones. Past research suggests that individual large language models (LLMs) tend to underperform compared to human crowd aggregates. We simulate a wisdom of the crowd effect with LLMs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!